diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016868.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016868.html | 136 |
1 files changed, 136 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016868.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016868.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4bf4b5ca3 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016868.html @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Backports Summary + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20Summary&In-Reply-To=%3C1534006.LEDd6qrHLc%40localhost%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016858.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="016875.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary</H1> + <B>AL13N</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20Summary&In-Reply-To=%3C1534006.LEDd6qrHLc%40localhost%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary">alien at rmail.be + </A><BR> + <I>Wed Jun 27 08:17:19 CEST 2012</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016858.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="016875.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#16868">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#16868">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#16868">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#16868">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>Op dinsdag 26 juni 2012 23:15:16 schreef Sander Lepik: +><i> 26.06.2012 22:25, Thomas Backlund kirjutas: +</I>><i> > * backports is supported as long as the rest of the release +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > Comments? Questions ? +</I>><i> +</I>><i> I think we should change the wording from "supported" to "tested". Currently +</I>><i> we can "support" backport with a newer version of the backport. But i don't +</I>><i> think it's a wise move to mark backports repo as an updates repo. So i +</I>><i> don't see how we can _support_ backports. And QA has no time to deal with +</I>><i> updates for backports (i mean to search for security holes in backports). +</I>><i> But this can be discussed tomorrow. +</I> +i agree, this is only a wording change, but is imho substantially different +from complete support, which is impossible. +</PRE> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016858.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="016875.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#16868">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#16868">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#16868">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#16868">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |