blob: 4bf4b5ca34c9c4418e07870f95542960618131d2 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Backports Summary
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20Summary&In-Reply-To=%3C1534006.LEDd6qrHLc%40localhost%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016858.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="016875.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary</H1>
<B>AL13N</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20Summary&In-Reply-To=%3C1534006.LEDd6qrHLc%40localhost%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary">alien at rmail.be
</A><BR>
<I>Wed Jun 27 08:17:19 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016858.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016875.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16868">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16868">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16868">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16868">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Op dinsdag 26 juni 2012 23:15:16 schreef Sander Lepik:
><i> 26.06.2012 22:25, Thomas Backlund kirjutas:
</I>><i> > * backports is supported as long as the rest of the release
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > Comments? Questions ?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I think we should change the wording from "supported" to "tested". Currently
</I>><i> we can "support" backport with a newer version of the backport. But i don't
</I>><i> think it's a wise move to mark backports repo as an updates repo. So i
</I>><i> don't see how we can _support_ backports. And QA has no time to deal with
</I>><i> updates for backports (i mean to search for security holes in backports).
</I>><i> But this can be discussed tomorrow.
</I>
i agree, this is only a wording change, but is imho substantially different
from complete support, which is impossible.
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016858.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016875.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16868">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16868">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16868">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16868">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
