diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016858.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016858.html | 138 |
1 files changed, 138 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016858.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016858.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d0aac0bcf --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016858.html @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Backports Summary + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20Summary&In-Reply-To=%3C4FEA1854.6090105%40eesti.ee%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016916.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="016868.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary</H1> + <B>Sander Lepik</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20Summary&In-Reply-To=%3C4FEA1854.6090105%40eesti.ee%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary">sander.lepik at eesti.ee + </A><BR> + <I>Tue Jun 26 22:15:16 CEST 2012</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016916.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="016868.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#16858">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#16858">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#16858">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#16858">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>26.06.2012 22:25, Thomas Backlund kirjutas: +><i> * backports is supported as long as the rest of the release +</I>><i> +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Comments? Questions ? +</I>I think we should change the wording from "supported" to "tested". Currently we can +"support" backport with a newer version of the backport. But i don't think it's a wise move +to mark backports repo as an updates repo. So i don't see how we can _support_ backports. +And QA has no time to deal with updates for backports (i mean to search for security holes +in backports). But this can be discussed tomorrow. + +-- +Sander + +</PRE> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016916.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="016868.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#16858">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#16858">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#16858">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#16858">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |