blob: d0aac0bcf2753a10fbe02125af3079a763249a23 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Backports Summary
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20Summary&In-Reply-To=%3C4FEA1854.6090105%40eesti.ee%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016916.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="016868.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary</H1>
<B>Sander Lepik</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20Summary&In-Reply-To=%3C4FEA1854.6090105%40eesti.ee%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary">sander.lepik at eesti.ee
</A><BR>
<I>Tue Jun 26 22:15:16 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016916.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016868.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16858">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16858">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16858">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16858">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>26.06.2012 22:25, Thomas Backlund kirjutas:
><i> * backports is supported as long as the rest of the release
</I>><i>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Comments? Questions ?
</I>I think we should change the wording from "supported" to "tested". Currently we can
"support" backport with a newer version of the backport. But i don't think it's a wise move
to mark backports repo as an updates repo. So i don't see how we can _support_ backports.
And QA has no time to deal with updates for backports (i mean to search for security holes
in backports). But this can be discussed tomorrow.
--
Sander
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016916.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="016868.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports Summary
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#16858">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#16858">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#16858">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#16858">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|