diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-July/017190.html')
-rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-July/017190.html | 106 |
1 files changed, 106 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-July/017190.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-July/017190.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b27c368ce --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-July/017190.html @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Security updates - Help needed (also forgot avidemux and gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg) + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Security%20updates%20-%20Help%20needed%20%28also%20forgot%0A%09avidemux%20and%20gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg%29&In-Reply-To=%3C1717649.hx2Q2iD3Fl%40localhost%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="017188.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="017180.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] Security updates - Help needed (also forgot avidemux and gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg)</H1> + <B>AL13N</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Security%20updates%20-%20Help%20needed%20%28also%20forgot%0A%09avidemux%20and%20gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg%29&In-Reply-To=%3C1717649.hx2Q2iD3Fl%40localhost%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Security updates - Help needed (also forgot avidemux and gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg)">alien at rmail.be + </A><BR> + <I>Fri Jul 6 08:09:04 CEST 2012</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="017188.html">[Mageia-dev] Security updates - Help needed (also forgot avidemux and gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg) +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="017180.html">[Mageia-dev] Security updates - Help needed (also forgot avidemux and gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg) +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#17190">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#17190">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#17190">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#17190">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>Op donderdag 5 juli 2012 20:34:08 schreef David Walser: +><i> AL13N wrote: +</I>><i> > this is a good point: "BTW, a missing dependency should not be +</I>><i> > considered a blocking issue as it can be easily fixed by the end user. +</I>><i> > Especially for a security update, as he probably already done it." +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > also, not sure, but it seems the tester was unawere of perl-CGI-Fast being +</I>><i> > not really required (i think). +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > still, IRC meeting yesterday seemed to conclude that security or major bug +</I>><i> > updates cannot be majorly delayed by bugs, it is however ok, to ask +</I>><i> > packager to do a quick fix for something at the same time. +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > still, for this issue, it seems also that there was a month delay due to +</I>><i> > not setting assigned back. or even setting NEEDINFO. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Incorrect. There was a month delay because the packager who first submitted +</I>><i> it to QA failed to provide an update for Mageia 2. That person also failed +</I>><i> to make any comment whatsoever, while being aware that questions had been +</I>><i> raised. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Let me be clear, I know we're all busy, and I don't expect things to be +</I>><i> fixed right away all the time. However, we need to communicate. Even if +</I>><i> you don't have time to fix something, if you know there are issues, and you +</I>><i> have some input to give on it, give it. I really don't appreciate being +</I>><i> ignored for a month, and then when someone else tries to help, all of +</I>><i> sudden you (not you Maarten) finally speak up and complain about what has +</I>><i> been done. +</I> +i do understand, however, as i said, even though QA might be ignored, i think +QA still would have to validate it, when QA reads this and sees no response, +imho :-( . + +><i> > also, i notice that noone seemed to have pointed out the tester that in +</I>><i> > fact that dependency isn't required. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> But it is used by the default configuration, so a suggests is appropriate. +</I>><i> Our packages should be functional out of the box. +</I> +iiuc, the qa team member says it's required, and not suggested, and noone from +packaging team thought about mentioning that it should be a suggests. (of +course, i didn't know this, but suspected it) + +><i> > i also see that some sentences look harsh to one of both sides here. (or +</I>><i> > at +</I>><i> > least to me). +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Yes, that is true. Both sides could tone it down, and it is really not +</I>><i> appropriate to have that kind of argument in public on Bugzilla (IMO). +</I></PRE> + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="017188.html">[Mageia-dev] Security updates - Help needed (also forgot avidemux and gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg) +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="017180.html">[Mageia-dev] Security updates - Help needed (also forgot avidemux and gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg) +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#17190">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#17190">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#17190">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#17190">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |