summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101205/001616.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101205/001616.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101205/001616.html97
1 files changed, 97 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101205/001616.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101205/001616.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3461fc2b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101205/001616.html
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout%2C%20round%20two&In-Reply-To=%3C201012052219.21772.maarten.vanraes%40gmail.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001614.html">
+
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two</H1>
+ <B>Maarten Vanraes</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout%2C%20round%20two&In-Reply-To=%3C201012052219.21772.maarten.vanraes%40gmail.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two">maarten.vanraes at gmail.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Sun Dec 5 22:19:21 CET 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001614.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+</A></li>
+
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1616">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1616">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1616">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1616">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Op zondag 05 december 2010 21:50:00 schreef Erin Wilkins:
+&gt;<i> On December 5, 2010 10:59:45 Maarten Vanraes wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Op zaterdag 04 december 2010 20:58:12 schreef Erin Wilkins:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; Since the packages in that repository are there because they're
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; (potentially) encumbered by patents, why not call it for what it is,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; &quot;encumbered&quot;?
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; --
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; Erin
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; too difficult
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> To understand? If that's the case, I think you're going to be stuck with
+</I>&gt;<i> &quot;tainted&quot;. And while I don't have an issue with it, this whole discussion
+</I>&gt;<i> started because some people find it too negative.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> The purpose of the repository name is to convey what sort of packages are
+</I>&gt;<i> contained in it. While many of the names that have been mentioned (foggy,
+</I>&gt;<i> speculative, etc) are relatively easy to remember, they don't have any
+</I>&gt;<i> existing meanings with regard to software. If I, or pretty much any other
+</I>&gt;<i> user, were not following this thread, I would not understand what sort of
+</I>&gt;<i> packages would be in a repository with those names. And like any other name
+</I>&gt;<i> that I wouldn't understand, I'd have to look up the documentation.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I don't know about you, but I'd rather go with a name that conveys an
+</I>&gt;<i> existing meaning, but some people will need to look at the documentation
+</I>&gt;<i> to understand.
+</I>
+I understand your point. however, Mageia is international and i think a high
+group of international no-native-english-speakers will have a hard time finding
+out what this is about...
+
+the english language is pretty rich; and i suspect there are quite a few words
+that could convey the correct meaning without the word being too difficult.
+
+otoh, there is also the fact that &quot;free&quot; or &quot;core&quot; don't really convey the
+correct meaning at all either and could be quite dubious.
+
+patented would be more correct, but i don't wanna call it that, because then
+mageia would be sued by patent-lawyers all over the world. don't get me wrong,
+it wouldn't be illegal, but it would just be too timeconsuming...
+
+imho, we should have a simple not too difficult word that somehow shows a bit
+about the nature of the contents in it, while still being vague enough.
+</PRE>
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001614.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+</A></li>
+
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1616">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1616">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1616">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1616">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>