summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101205/001616.html
blob: 3461fc2b382551622a57e1b77f351a4dd8545210 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout%2C%20round%20two&In-Reply-To=%3C201012052219.21772.maarten.vanraes%40gmail.com%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="001614.html">
   
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two</H1>
    <B>Maarten Vanraes</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout%2C%20round%20two&In-Reply-To=%3C201012052219.21772.maarten.vanraes%40gmail.com%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two">maarten.vanraes at gmail.com
       </A><BR>
    <I>Sun Dec  5 22:19:21 CET 2010</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001614.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
</A></li>
        
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#1616">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#1616">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#1616">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#1616">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Op zondag 05 december 2010 21:50:00 schreef Erin Wilkins:
&gt;<i> On December 5, 2010 10:59:45 Maarten Vanraes wrote:
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Op zaterdag 04 december 2010 20:58:12 schreef Erin Wilkins:
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; Since the packages in that repository are there because they're
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; (potentially) encumbered by patents, why not call it for what it is,
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; &quot;encumbered&quot;?
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; 
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; --
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; Erin
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; 
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; too difficult
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> To understand? If that's the case, I think you're going to be stuck with
</I>&gt;<i> &quot;tainted&quot;. And while I don't have an issue with it, this whole discussion
</I>&gt;<i> started because some people find it too negative.
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> The purpose of the repository name is to convey what sort of packages are
</I>&gt;<i> contained in it. While many of the names that have been mentioned (foggy,
</I>&gt;<i> speculative, etc) are relatively easy to remember, they don't have any
</I>&gt;<i> existing meanings with regard to software. If I, or pretty much any other
</I>&gt;<i> user, were not following this thread, I would not understand what sort of
</I>&gt;<i> packages would be in a repository with those names. And like any other name
</I>&gt;<i> that I wouldn't understand, I'd have to look up the documentation.
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> I don't know about you, but I'd rather go with a name that conveys an
</I>&gt;<i> existing meaning, but some people will need to look at the documentation
</I>&gt;<i> to understand.
</I>
I understand your point. however, Mageia is international and i think a high 
group of international no-native-english-speakers will have a hard time finding 
out what this is about...

the english language is pretty rich; and i suspect there are quite a few words 
that could convey the correct meaning without the word being too difficult.

otoh, there is also the fact that &quot;free&quot; or &quot;core&quot; don't really convey the 
correct meaning at all either and could be quite dubious.

patented would be more correct, but i don't wanna call it that, because then 
mageia would be sued by patent-lawyers all over the world. don't get me wrong, 
it wouldn't be illegal, but it would just be too timeconsuming...

imho, we should have a simple not too difficult word that somehow shows a bit 
about the nature of the contents in it, while still being vague enough.
</PRE>

<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001614.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
</A></li>
	
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#1616">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#1616">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#1616">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#1616">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>