diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101205/da2938d0/attachment.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101205/da2938d0/attachment.html | 82 |
1 files changed, 82 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101205/da2938d0/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101205/da2938d0/attachment.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..725405689 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101205/da2938d0/attachment.html @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 9:32 PM, andre999 <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:andr55@laposte.net">andr55@laposte.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> +Dale Huckeby a écrit :<br> +<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> +On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, andre999 wrote:<br> +<br> +<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> +John a écrit :<br> +<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> +<br> +On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:28:26 +0100<br> +Maarten Vanraes wrote:<br> +<br> +<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> +Op vrijdag 03 december 2010 10:45:05 schreef Ahmad Samir:<br> +[...]<br> +<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> +The kernel uses the word "tainted" when it detects the nvidia<br> +proprietary module for example, (which admittedly gave me a bit of<br> +shock the first time I saw it :)).<br> +</blockquote> +<br> +Heh, i had the same reaction.<br> +<br> +<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> +>From all the proposed names, I think "tainted" is the best one, as the<br> +<br> +packages in there are in a "grey" zone, i.e. not totally illegal<br> +everywhere, but illegal only in some places in the world. And in<br> +reality the existence of a patent doesn't necessarily mean it's<br> +enforceable in a court of law (the only way we'd know for sure is if<br> +someone actually does try to sue)... my 0.02€ worth :)<br> +</blockquote></blockquote></blockquote> +<br> +Generally only potentially "illegal" in some countries.<br> +"Tainted" means contaminated, polluted. A lot stronger than<br> +potentially "illegal". (Really only actionable in a civil sense, not<br> +criminally illegal, as well.)<br> +A package could end up there due to an apparently credible rumour,<br> +later discredited. (Anyone remember SCO ?)<br> +</blockquote> +<br> +I agree. Problematic comes closer to "potentially illegal", so I looked<br> +up some synonyms: ambiguous, debatable, dubious,<br> +iffy, suspect, speculative, precarious, suspicious, uncertain,<br> +unsettled, in addition to problematic itself. Personally<br> +I like iffy, which is both short and to the point, but I think several<br> +of these would do. WDYT?<br> +<br> +Dale Huckeby<br> +<br> +</blockquote> +A much better set of choices.<br> +(Thanks for looking these up. Good idea.)<br> +<br> +Let's remember that the question for these packages is not the quality of their functioning - but rather the advisability to use them, for other reasons, in some countries.<br> +So I think that it is better to avoid words that could question the QUALITY of the packages.<br> +<br> +Words in the list like<br> + ambiguous, debatable, problematic, and speculative<br> +avoid questioning the quality ... but could be too long or too formal.<br> +Or just not catchy enough ;)<br> +("Iffy" might be ok - certainly catchy enough.)<br> +<br> +Additional words I found in Roget's thesaurus, along the same lines :<br> +<br> +Associated more with debatable :<br> +arguable, contestable, controvertible, disputable, questionable,<br> +<br> +Associated more with controversial :<br> +confutable, deniable, mistakable, moot<br> +<br> +Of these additional words, I think that "contestable", "disputable", and "controversial" are probably closest to the SENSE of the repositories.<br> +But maybe too formal ?<br> +<br> +Many of these words could be good choices.<br> +And maybe someone will come up with some more ?<br> +<br> +my 2 cents :)<br> +<br> +- André<br> +</blockquote></div><br>What about: main, free, non-free?<br>In main is everything what belongs to the core, free contains only packages which are under a free license and in non-free are those which aren't clear if free or not (what you mentioned earlier in this discussion).<br> +<br>All three names are as clear as possible what's meant.<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Mit freundlichen Grüßen<br><br>Greetings<br><br>Daniel Kreuter<br><br><br><br> |