summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20110303/003845.html
blob: 2d4531ecdf8f5e61956711219f5280aa0bfffda5 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Linux is a KERNEL not an OS
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Linux%20is%20a%20KERNEL%20not%20an%20OS&In-Reply-To=%3C1299113452.29682.41.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="003844.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="003854.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-discuss] Linux is a KERNEL not an OS</H1>
    <B>Michael Scherer</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Linux%20is%20a%20KERNEL%20not%20an%20OS&In-Reply-To=%3C1299113452.29682.41.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Linux is a KERNEL not an OS">misc at zarb.org
       </A><BR>
    <I>Thu Mar  3 01:50:52 CET 2011</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003844.html">[Mageia-discuss] Linux is a KERNEL not an OS
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="003854.html">[Mageia-discuss] Linux is a KERNEL not an OS
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#3845">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#3845">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#3845">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#3845">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le mercredi 02 mars 2011 &#224; 23:22 +0100, Wolfgang Bornath a &#233;crit :
&gt;<i> 2011/3/2 Andr&#233; Sala&#252;n &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">andresalaun at free.fr</A>&gt;:
</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; But using only Linux because it is &quot;common&quot; for
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; uninformed people is simplistic ; as we say in French :
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &#171; l'enfer est pav&#233; de bonnes intentions &#187;
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &#171; the road to hell is paved with good intentions &#187;
</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Furthermore someone (like me and some others perhaps ) can be
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; interesting in &#171; popular education &#187; (&#233;ducation populaire)  and
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; relations between free software, free sciences free...
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Oversimplification of the word is always oversimplifaction of the
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; concept. Even if it seems to be easier I see that as a fault.
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> I have seen the history of GNU and Linux and their &quot;marriage&quot; (because
</I>&gt;<i> the GNU people did not have any simple and free kernel for their
</I>&gt;<i> software). So, from my point of view there's a good chance that Linux
</I>&gt;<i> could have grown to a full operating system even without the GNU
</I>&gt;<i> project. 
</I>
The gnu project provided lots of software, some quite unavoidable like a
compiler, a standard library, or stuff like screen, gettext and slightly
low level tools ( binutils, coreutils, etc ).

&gt;<i> On the other side nobody could tell if the GNU project would
</I>&gt;<i> have survived without Linux. Both thoughts are speculations, of
</I>&gt;<i> course.
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> But would a GNU/Linux naming policy not neglect the merits of all the
</I>&gt;<i> other projects who actually made the &quot;Gnu/Linux&quot; system a real usable
</I>&gt;<i> package? Imagine a distribution only supplying Linux and what remains
</I>&gt;<i> from the GNU project (especially Emacs) - would any user actually use
</I>&gt;<i> it (except developpers and &quot;tech freaks&quot;)? 
</I>
I doubt developers would use something without gcc ( granted, there is
pcc or llvm ) and without a libc ( granted again, someone could use a
alternative like dietlibc etc )

&gt;<i> I serioously doubt that
</I>&gt;<i> this kind of package would never have made it out of the university
</I>&gt;<i> and research labs environment, let alone conquer the business world.
</I>
Some people did it : <A HREF="http://www.skarnet.org/poweredby.html">http://www.skarnet.org/poweredby.html</A>

( and some would say that this is almost done for <A HREF="http://openbsd.org/">http://openbsd.org/</A> ,
since the compiler is near 1.0 :
<A HREF="http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&amp;sid=20110223045047">http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&amp;sid=20110223045047</A>  )

-- 
Michael Scherer

</PRE>



<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003844.html">[Mageia-discuss] Linux is a KERNEL not an OS
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="003854.html">[Mageia-discuss] Linux is a KERNEL not an OS
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#3845">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#3845">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#3845">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#3845">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>