1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] rpm or deb?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20rpm%20or%20deb%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4C9FCBEC.106%40marneau.eu%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001331.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="001348.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-discuss] rpm or deb?</H1>
<B>Lucien-Henry Horvath</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20rpm%20or%20deb%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4C9FCBEC.106%40marneau.eu%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] rpm or deb?">tempo2 at marneau.eu
</A><BR>
<I>Mon Sep 27 00:40:44 CEST 2010</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001331.html">[Mageia-discuss] Chinese translation for Mageia's page
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="001348.html">[Mageia-discuss] rpm or deb?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#1333">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#1333">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#1333">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#1333">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Hi, (en FR en-dessous)
My suggestion is a little crazy ...
With the new departure of this distro, perhaps is it a good idea to
invent a sort of "unified managment" of DEV / RPM.
We start on urpmi, and add to urpmi the abilities to encapsulate apt-get ?
So just easy play " urpmi <A HREF="http://www.skype.com/download/skype.deb">http://www.skype.com/download/skype.deb</A>" ;-)
It's auto-manage dependencies and finaly, urpmi launch "apt-get install".
Is it technicaly possible ?
--
Bonjour (in EN up)
Ma suggestion suivante va paraître débile, mais ...
En créant une nouvelle distribution, ce serait peut-être une bonne idée
d'inventer _enfin_ une sorte de "gestion unifiée" des paquetages deb et rpm.
L'idée est d'encapsuler apt-get dans urpmi.
Ainsi, on lance juste urpmi "URL/téléchargement/fichier.deb" et ça gère
tout seul les dépendances.
Est-ce techniquement possible ?
Le 26/09/2010 23:55, Carlos Daniel Ruvalcaba Valenzuela a écrit :
><i> I personally found no practical advantage of using apt-get vs urpmi,
</I>><i> while apt has many nice features urpmi is also solid and works
</I>><i> perfectly in most common cases, the only problem you may have is with
</I>><i> malformed packages or with erroneous dependency information, in which
</I>><i> case the only advantage of apt-get is the fact that Debian takes a lot
</I>><i> of care of having correct and working packages, which most RPM based
</I>><i> distros does too (you may get problems with 3th party repos but that
</I>><i> is another problem).
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Being a Mandriva fork we would logically stick with it's tools and
</I>><i> packaging system.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Regards,
</I>><i> Carlos Daniel Ruvalcaba Valenzuela
</I>><i>
</I>><i> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Kristoffer Grundström
</I>><i> <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">kristoffer.grundstrom1983 at gmail.com</A>> wrote:
</I>><i>
</I>>><i> Why not create a new format with the best of both worlds (if possible)?
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> .mageia ?
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> Hoyt Duff skrev 2010-09-26 19:44:
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 7:13 AM, RAVI KUMAR BALASUBRAMANIAM
</I>>><i> <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">ravikumar17jan at gmail.com</A>> wrote:
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> only thing i hate about mandriva is its rpm based packages
</I>>><i> i prefer apt and deb personally
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> I can understand a personal preference, but why do you believe that
</I>>><i> deb is superior to rpm? Given that Mandriva is already rpm-based, what
</I>>><i> benefit could be derived from abandoning the existing build system and
</I>>><i> urpmi?
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> > From everything I have read, neither system has a clear advantage over
</I>>><i> the other, and the end result of using either is essentially the same.
</I>>><i> I don't believe that changing to a deb-based system would provide any
</I>>><i> significant benefit to justify the expense in terms of re-training
</I>>><i> devs and creating a new build system.
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i>
</I>><i>
</I>
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001331.html">[Mageia-discuss] Chinese translation for Mageia's page
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="001348.html">[Mageia-discuss] rpm or deb?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#1333">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#1333">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#1333">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#1333">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
