diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100927/001333.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100927/001333.html | 122 |
1 files changed, 122 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100927/001333.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100927/001333.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..983558acc --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100927/001333.html @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] rpm or deb? + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20rpm%20or%20deb%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4C9FCBEC.106%40marneau.eu%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001331.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001348.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-discuss] rpm or deb?</H1> + <B>Lucien-Henry Horvath</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20rpm%20or%20deb%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4C9FCBEC.106%40marneau.eu%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] rpm or deb?">tempo2 at marneau.eu + </A><BR> + <I>Mon Sep 27 00:40:44 CEST 2010</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001331.html">[Mageia-discuss] Chinese translation for Mageia's page +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001348.html">[Mageia-discuss] rpm or deb? +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#1333">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#1333">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#1333">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#1333">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>Hi, (en FR en-dessous) +My suggestion is a little crazy ... +With the new departure of this distro, perhaps is it a good idea to +invent a sort of "unified managment" of DEV / RPM. +We start on urpmi, and add to urpmi the abilities to encapsulate apt-get ? +So just easy play " urpmi <A HREF="http://www.skype.com/download/skype.deb">http://www.skype.com/download/skype.deb</A>" ;-) +It's auto-manage dependencies and finaly, urpmi launch "apt-get install". +Is it technicaly possible ? +-- +Bonjour (in EN up) +Ma suggestion suivante va paraître débile, mais ... +En créant une nouvelle distribution, ce serait peut-être une bonne idée +d'inventer _enfin_ une sorte de "gestion unifiée" des paquetages deb et rpm. +L'idée est d'encapsuler apt-get dans urpmi. +Ainsi, on lance juste urpmi "URL/téléchargement/fichier.deb" et ça gère +tout seul les dépendances. +Est-ce techniquement possible ? + + + +Le 26/09/2010 23:55, Carlos Daniel Ruvalcaba Valenzuela a écrit : +><i> I personally found no practical advantage of using apt-get vs urpmi, +</I>><i> while apt has many nice features urpmi is also solid and works +</I>><i> perfectly in most common cases, the only problem you may have is with +</I>><i> malformed packages or with erroneous dependency information, in which +</I>><i> case the only advantage of apt-get is the fact that Debian takes a lot +</I>><i> of care of having correct and working packages, which most RPM based +</I>><i> distros does too (you may get problems with 3th party repos but that +</I>><i> is another problem). +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Being a Mandriva fork we would logically stick with it's tools and +</I>><i> packaging system. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Regards, +</I>><i> Carlos Daniel Ruvalcaba Valenzuela +</I>><i> +</I>><i> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Kristoffer Grundström +</I>><i> <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">kristoffer.grundstrom1983 at gmail.com</A>> wrote: +</I>><i> +</I>>><i> Why not create a new format with the best of both worlds (if possible)? +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> .mageia ? +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> Hoyt Duff skrev 2010-09-26 19:44: +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 7:13 AM, RAVI KUMAR BALASUBRAMANIAM +</I>>><i> <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">ravikumar17jan at gmail.com</A>> wrote: +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> only thing i hate about mandriva is its rpm based packages +</I>>><i> i prefer apt and deb personally +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> I can understand a personal preference, but why do you believe that +</I>>><i> deb is superior to rpm? Given that Mandriva is already rpm-based, what +</I>>><i> benefit could be derived from abandoning the existing build system and +</I>>><i> urpmi? +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> > From everything I have read, neither system has a clear advantage over +</I>>><i> the other, and the end result of using either is essentially the same. +</I>>><i> I don't believe that changing to a deb-based system would provide any +</I>>><i> significant benefit to justify the expense in terms of re-training +</I>>><i> devs and creating a new build system. +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> +</I>><i> +</I> +</PRE> + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001331.html">[Mageia-discuss] Chinese translation for Mageia's page +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001348.html">[Mageia-discuss] rpm or deb? +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#1333">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#1333">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#1333">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#1333">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |