blob: a58796ec6afce673ad0ae38eeefacb9837b8b59e (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] unity on mageia
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20unity%20on%20mageia&In-Reply-To=%3C505240ED.4040006%40mageia.org%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="018663.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="018665.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] unity on mageia</H1>
<B>Thomas Backlund</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20unity%20on%20mageia&In-Reply-To=%3C505240ED.4040006%40mageia.org%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] unity on mageia">tmb at mageia.org
</A><BR>
<I>Thu Sep 13 22:24:13 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="018663.html">[Mageia-dev] unity on mageia
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="018665.html">[Mageia-dev] unity on mageia
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#18664">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#18664">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#18664">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#18664">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>13.09.2012 23:08, Damian Ivanov skrev:
>><i> You mean using opensuse build system?
</I>><i> Absolutely.
</I>><i>
</I>>><i> As far as i can say adding the availability to build also mageia
</I>>><i> packages could be a good thing.
</I>><i> I think best would even be Mageia being build by OBS itself as whole
</I>><i> distribution.
</I>><i>
</I>
Why? We already have a working buildsystem.
>><i> As far as user concerned though, using different repositories that
</I>>><i> are not officials could be dangerous.
</I>>><i> I'd prefer to have contributor in mageia instead...
</I>><i> Fedora and oepnSUSE unity is like this and if we have 3-4 maintainers
</I>><i> (one for Fedora, openSUSE, Mageia etc)
</I>><i> it should be even more safe than directly in the distribution. 4
</I>><i> distri maintainers watching the same sources and patches and one
</I>><i> place.
</I>
Well, I dont see stuff doing hacks like "Obsoletes/Provides gtk3" to
replace the real upstream packages ever being allowed in official repos.
--
Thomas
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="018663.html">[Mageia-dev] unity on mageia
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="018665.html">[Mageia-dev] unity on mageia
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#18664">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#18664">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#18664">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#18664">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|