<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] unity on mageia
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20unity%20on%20mageia&In-Reply-To=%3C505240ED.4040006%40mageia.org%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="018663.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="018665.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] unity on mageia</H1>
    <B>Thomas Backlund</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20unity%20on%20mageia&In-Reply-To=%3C505240ED.4040006%40mageia.org%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] unity on mageia">tmb at mageia.org
       </A><BR>
    <I>Thu Sep 13 22:24:13 CEST 2012</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="018663.html">[Mageia-dev] unity on mageia
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="018665.html">[Mageia-dev] unity on mageia
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#18664">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#18664">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#18664">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#18664">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>13.09.2012 23:08, Damian Ivanov skrev:
&gt;&gt;<i> You mean using opensuse build system?
</I>&gt;<i> Absolutely.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> As far as i can say adding the availability to build also mageia
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> packages could be a good thing.
</I>&gt;<i> I think best would even be Mageia being build by OBS itself as whole
</I>&gt;<i> distribution.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>
Why? We already have a working buildsystem.


&gt;&gt;<i> As far as user concerned though, using different repositories that
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> are not officials could be dangerous.
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> I'd prefer to have contributor in mageia instead...
</I>&gt;<i> Fedora and oepnSUSE unity is like this and if we have 3-4 maintainers
</I>&gt;<i> (one for Fedora, openSUSE, Mageia etc)
</I>&gt;<i> it should be even more safe than directly in the distribution. 4
</I>&gt;<i> distri maintainers watching the same sources and patches and one
</I>&gt;<i> place.
</I>

Well, I dont see stuff doing hacks like &quot;Obsoletes/Provides gtk3&quot; to
replace the real upstream packages ever being allowed in official repos.


--
Thomas

</PRE>





















<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="018663.html">[Mageia-dev] unity on mageia
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="018665.html">[Mageia-dev] unity on mageia
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#18664">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#18664">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#18664">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#18664">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>