zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011408.html


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20qemu%20new%20upstream%20release%20%281.0-rc1%29%20and%20should%20we%0A%20move%20from%20qemu-kvm%20to%20qemu%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C1326780829.29662.21.camel%40liliana.cdg.redhat.com%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="011362.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="011410.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?</H1>
    <B>Michael Scherer</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20qemu%20new%20upstream%20release%20%281.0-rc1%29%20and%20should%20we%0A%20move%20from%20qemu-kvm%20to%20qemu%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C1326780829.29662.21.camel%40liliana.cdg.redhat.com%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?">misc at zarb.org
       </A><BR>
    <I>Tue Jan 17 07:13:49 CET 2012</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="011362.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="011410.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#11408">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#11408">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#11408">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#11408">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le samedi 14 janvier 2012 &#224; 21:10 +0100, Kamil Rytarowski a &#233;crit :

&gt;<i> Hi!
</I>&gt;<i> We have succeed to push the patch upstream 
</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=0e0e7facc775e9bb020314f48751b3d09f316c8b">http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=0e0e7facc775e9bb020314f48751b3d09f316c8b</A> 
</I>&gt;<i> It took 2 months.. It will be shipped with the next version of Qemu so 
</I>&gt;<i> no need to take care of the patch for next releases.
</I>
&gt;<i> Can I now patch the old Qemu in Mga1 to ship UDP support and therefore 
</I>&gt;<i> be usable within GNS3? I will then fix GNS3 and its requirements too.
</I>
That's a non bugfix update, so that doesn't fullfill the policy. 

I am not opposed on having the patch in cauldron however.

-- 
Michael Scherer

</PRE>


<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="011362.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="011410.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#11408">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#11408">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#11408">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#11408">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>