summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011408.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011408.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011408.html88
1 files changed, 88 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011408.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011408.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9eb97e7a8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011408.html
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20qemu%20new%20upstream%20release%20%281.0-rc1%29%20and%20should%20we%0A%20move%20from%20qemu-kvm%20to%20qemu%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C1326780829.29662.21.camel%40liliana.cdg.redhat.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="011362.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="011410.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?</H1>
+ <B>Michael Scherer</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20qemu%20new%20upstream%20release%20%281.0-rc1%29%20and%20should%20we%0A%20move%20from%20qemu-kvm%20to%20qemu%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C1326780829.29662.21.camel%40liliana.cdg.redhat.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?">misc at zarb.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Tue Jan 17 07:13:49 CET 2012</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="011362.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="011410.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#11408">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#11408">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#11408">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#11408">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Le samedi 14 janvier 2012 &#224; 21:10 +0100, Kamil Rytarowski a &#233;crit :
+
+&gt;<i> Hi!
+</I>&gt;<i> We have succeed to push the patch upstream
+</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=0e0e7facc775e9bb020314f48751b3d09f316c8b">http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=0e0e7facc775e9bb020314f48751b3d09f316c8b</A>
+</I>&gt;<i> It took 2 months.. It will be shipped with the next version of Qemu so
+</I>&gt;<i> no need to take care of the patch for next releases.
+</I>
+&gt;<i> Can I now patch the old Qemu in Mga1 to ship UDP support and therefore
+</I>&gt;<i> be usable within GNS3? I will then fix GNS3 and its requirements too.
+</I>
+That's a non bugfix update, so that doesn't fullfill the policy.
+
+I am not opposed on having the patch in cauldron however.
+
+--
+Michael Scherer
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="011362.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="011410.html">[Mageia-dev] qemu new upstream release (1.0-rc1) and should we move from qemu-kvm to qemu?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#11408">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#11408">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#11408">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#11408">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>