blob: 9583775c6bc023140b59646f8c24cb5ba857ce89 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Package%20removal%20proposal&In-Reply-To=%3C20120826173532.67c1d3d9%40SuperSize.eslrahc.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="018312.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="018245.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal</H1>
<B>Charles A Edwards</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Package%20removal%20proposal&In-Reply-To=%3C20120826173532.67c1d3d9%40SuperSize.eslrahc.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal">CAE at eslrahc.com
</A><BR>
<I>Sun Aug 26 23:35:32 CEST 2012</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="018312.html">[Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="018245.html">[Mageia-dev] itstool vs gnome-doc-utils
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#18314">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#18314">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#18314">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#18314">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 15:15:04 +0100
Colin Guthrie wrote:
><i> Obsoletes in packages which genuinely replace the old one seem
</I>><i> reasonable and uncontroversial.
</I>
It is both reasonable and uncontroversial because the User is given the
choice.
With obsoletes in packages Before any installation or package removal
via urpmi/rpmdrake
1) user is informed that rpm A must be removed for other rpms to
be updated
2) user is given the option y/n before the installation/removal
proceeds.
If using task-obsolete
1) user does not know Which or When rpm/s will be removed
2) user does not know Why the rpm must be removed
3) user has no choice as this is all occurring in secret
Charles
--
// Minor lesson: don't fuck about with something you don't fully
understand -- the dosdoom source code
----------------------
Mageia release 3 (Cauldron) for x86_64$
On SuperSize....<A HREF="http://www.eslrahc.com">http://www.eslrahc.com</A>
Registered Linux user #182463
3.5.2-tmb-server-1.mga3 x86_64
----------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/mageia-dev/attachments/20120826/bf71619a/attachment-0001.asc>
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="018312.html">[Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="018245.html">[Mageia-dev] itstool vs gnome-doc-utils
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#18314">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#18314">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#18314">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#18314">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
