<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Package%20removal%20proposal&In-Reply-To=%3C20120826173532.67c1d3d9%40SuperSize.eslrahc.com%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="018312.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="018245.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal</H1>
    <B>Charles A Edwards</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Package%20removal%20proposal&In-Reply-To=%3C20120826173532.67c1d3d9%40SuperSize.eslrahc.com%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal">CAE at eslrahc.com
       </A><BR>
    <I>Sun Aug 26 23:35:32 CEST 2012</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="018312.html">[Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="018245.html">[Mageia-dev] itstool vs gnome-doc-utils
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#18314">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#18314">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#18314">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#18314">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 15:15:04 +0100
Colin Guthrie wrote:

&gt;<i> Obsoletes in packages which genuinely replace the old one seem
</I>&gt;<i> reasonable and uncontroversial.
</I>
It is both reasonable and uncontroversial because the User is given the
choice.

With obsoletes in packages Before any installation or package removal
via urpmi/rpmdrake
1)	user is informed that rpm A must be removed for other rpms to
	be updated
2)	user is given the option y/n before the installation/removal
	proceeds.

If using task-obsolete 
1)	user does not know Which or When rpm/s will be removed
2)	user does not know Why the rpm must be removed
3)	user has no choice as this is all occurring in secret	


    Charles
	

-- 
// Minor lesson: don't fuck about with something you don't fully
understand -- the dosdoom source code
----------------------
Mageia release 3 (Cauldron) for x86_64$
On SuperSize....<A HREF="http://www.eslrahc.com">http://www.eslrahc.com</A>
Registered Linux user #182463
3.5.2-tmb-server-1.mga3 x86_64
----------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: &lt;/pipermail/mageia-dev/attachments/20120826/bf71619a/attachment-0001.asc&gt;
</PRE>




<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="018312.html">[Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="018245.html">[Mageia-dev] itstool vs gnome-doc-utils
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#18314">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#18314">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#18314">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#18314">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>