summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110222/002731.html
blob: 5da11849b71d380b7be1bed69ff21601f1729243 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] time to switch from raw partitions to lvm?
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20time%20to%20switch%20from%20raw%20partitions%20to%20lvm%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C281956610.31298362038904.JavaMail.root%40zimbrastaff-vm1.telkomsa.net%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="002730.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="002732.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] time to switch from raw partitions to lvm?</H1>
    <B>Buchan Milne</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20time%20to%20switch%20from%20raw%20partitions%20to%20lvm%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C281956610.31298362038904.JavaMail.root%40zimbrastaff-vm1.telkomsa.net%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] time to switch from raw partitions to lvm?">bgmilne at staff.telkomsa.net
       </A><BR>
    <I>Tue Feb 22 09:07:18 CET 2011</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002730.html">[Mageia-dev] time to switch from raw partitions to lvm?
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002732.html">[Mageia-dev] time to switch from raw partitions to lvm?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#2731">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#2731">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#2731">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#2731">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>
----- &quot;Wolfgang Bornath&quot; &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">molch.b at googlemail.com</A>&gt; wrote:

&gt;<i> 2011/2/21 Buchan Milne &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">bgmilne at staff.telkomsa.net</A>&gt;:
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; On Monday, 21 February 2011 11:49:27 Thomas Lottmann wrote:
</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; I am still not convinced of how easy this can be. For having
</I>&gt;<i> attempted
</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; to manage (and learn) how to manage LVM partitons with CentOS, it
</I>&gt;<i> is
</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; quite complicated. So it certainly has many advantages, but I'm
</I>&gt;<i> awaiting
</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; an intuitive disk manager like Diskdrake to manage this stuff
</I>&gt;<i> without
</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; the need of preliminary knowledge.
</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Yes, with diskdrake, it's no problem. Anaconda's LVM interface is
</I>&gt;<i> quite
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; confusing and complex. After installation, AFAIK, you can't access
</I>&gt;<i> the same
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; interface. system-config-lvm (if it's still around) was also pretty
</I>&gt;<i> unusable.
</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; But, we have diskdrake, so why are the problems of CentOS an issue?
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> Because (as I remarked earlier) there are people who have other Linux
</I>&gt;<i> flavors on their harddisk before they try Mageia - what if they do
</I>&gt;<i> their partitioning with those (i.e. CentOS)?
</I>
Irrelevant. If there is free space, you can use LVM or not. Note CentOS defaults to LVM as of 5.x. If the whole disk is partitioned as a PV (likely with CentOS), then you will be forced to use LVM anyway ...

&gt;<i> Again, people do not work all the same.
</I>
Irrelevant. If this was the case, we would *FORCE* everyone to use LVM, or a large single root filesystem, or a complex layout, or something else. But we aren't discussing forcing of anything, just what the *default* option should be.

&gt;<i> There are people who do their
</I>&gt;<i> partitioning with 3rd-party apps like gparted or others.
</I>
Then they should not use the default, if they think they know better.

&gt;<i> There are
</I>&gt;<i> people who like to have a bootloader in the root partition of each
</I>&gt;<i> Linux they install (using chainloader in the first Linux' grub), etc.
</I>
Shame, IMHO putting bootloader in root partition is a bad idea. But, they can still do this. They can even install a bootloader in the boot partition of each distro, and use chainloader (which is what I do). No one is proposing preventing them from doing this.

&gt;<i> IMHO it is a bad idea to make LVM default, because there are too many
</I>&gt;<i> cases around where people would not want LVM.
</I>
IMHO, the majority of users *should* use LVM. The 10% who have specific reasons not to, will of course still be able to use normal partitions. The problem currently is that I suspect 90% of the users who should be using LVM, don't. Then, they need assistance from others to resize their /, or /home, or another filesystem that they sized incorrectly during installation.

Users shouldn't need to &quot;learn to partition&quot;, or &quot;practice installing&quot;, by doing installations over and over until they figure out that / should be at least 10GB, but most likely not larger than 30GB, depending on whether they compile a lot (e.g. build packages or not).

Is this really user-friendly? By this I mean, friendly to users who *haven't* used Linux before, not those who are installing their 10th distro on the same machine for the 15th time.

&gt;<i> LVM as an option is a
</I>&gt;<i> far better solution and let the user decide what he wants.
</I>
The user will still *always* be able to decide what he wants. The question is, what to do for users who don't know what to decide. IMHO, for a first time user, it is *much* better to give them a &quot;Use available space, with growable filesystems&quot; or similar, than a statically partitioned, based on difficult-to-get-right heuristics.

Regards,
Buchan
</PRE>


<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002730.html">[Mageia-dev] time to switch from raw partitions to lvm?
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="002732.html">[Mageia-dev] time to switch from raw partitions to lvm?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#2731">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#2731">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#2731">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#2731">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>