zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101002/000647.html


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C5293259.200931285978297317.JavaMail.www%40wsfrf1227%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="000662.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="000648.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?</H1>
    <B>J&#233;j&#233;</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C5293259.200931285978297317.JavaMail.www%40wsfrf1227%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?">jeje-mageia at sfr.fr
       </A><BR>
    <I>Sat Oct  2 02:11:37 CEST 2010</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000662.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="000648.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#647">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#647">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#647">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#647">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>atilla ontas wrote:

&gt;<i> I'm just wondering if we follow Mandriva's release cycle model.
</I>
(...)

&gt;<i> One more thing. Do we follow Mandriva's release naming scheme? I.e. do
</I>&gt;<i> we call our first release 2011.x ? I don't like this naming scheme and
</I>&gt;<i> suggesting using number of release as naming like Mageia 1.0 or using
</I>&gt;<i> code names.
</I>
&gt;<i> What's your opinion?
</I>
What about doing both :


o  First a conservative rolling distribution. There's a lot of demand for that kind of distribution, even Debian seems to think about a stable testing. It would be the way to use Mageia for the average desktop user.


o  In addition an about-1-year release cycle distribution, a &quot;snapshot&quot; of the rolling one, supported 2 years, more suitable for entreprise/server use or for people with very low internet bandwith.


I'm not certain it would be more time consuming than a 6 month release cycle, and it would please a lot of people.


</PRE>


<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000662.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000648.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#647">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#647">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#647">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#647">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>