diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101002/000647.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101002/000647.html | 93 |
1 files changed, 93 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101002/000647.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101002/000647.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4be3b600e --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101002/000647.html @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C5293259.200931285978297317.JavaMail.www%40wsfrf1227%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000662.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="000648.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?</H1> + <B>Jéjé</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C5293259.200931285978297317.JavaMail.www%40wsfrf1227%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?">jeje-mageia at sfr.fr + </A><BR> + <I>Sat Oct 2 02:11:37 CEST 2010</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000662.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="000648.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#647">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#647">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#647">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#647">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>atilla ontas wrote: + +><i> I'm just wondering if we follow Mandriva's release cycle model. +</I> +(...) + +><i> One more thing. Do we follow Mandriva's release naming scheme? I.e. do +</I>><i> we call our first release 2011.x ? I don't like this naming scheme and +</I>><i> suggesting using number of release as naming like Mageia 1.0 or using +</I>><i> code names. +</I> +><i> What's your opinion? +</I> +What about doing both : + + +o First a conservative rolling distribution. There's a lot of demand for that kind of distribution, even Debian seems to think about a stable testing. It would be the way to use Mageia for the average desktop user. + + +o In addition an about-1-year release cycle distribution, a "snapshot" of the rolling one, supported 2 years, more suitable for entreprise/server use or for people with very low internet bandwith. + + +I'm not certain it would be more time consuming than a 6 month release cycle, and it would please a lot of people. + + + + +</PRE> + + + + + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000662.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="000648.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#647">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#647">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#647">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#647">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |