summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2012-March/004314.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2012-March/004314.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2012-March/004314.html167
1 files changed, 167 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2012-March/004314.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2012-March/004314.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..bec8ab402
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2012-March/004314.html
@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-sysadm] [forums-discuss] Re: updating sysadmin privileges in forum config
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-sysadm%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20%5Bforums-discuss%5D%20Re%3A%20updating%20sysadmin%0A%20privileges%20in%20forum%20config&In-Reply-To=%3CCA%2Bh4nj6562TCZC%2BLZshuGPsB-9pfAX78AHvH4kur06jvy1s89Q%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="004312.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="004315.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-sysadm] [forums-discuss] Re: updating sysadmin privileges in forum config</H1>
+ <B>Wolfgang Bornath</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-sysadm%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20%5Bforums-discuss%5D%20Re%3A%20updating%20sysadmin%0A%20privileges%20in%20forum%20config&In-Reply-To=%3CCA%2Bh4nj6562TCZC%2BLZshuGPsB-9pfAX78AHvH4kur06jvy1s89Q%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-sysadm] [forums-discuss] Re: updating sysadmin privileges in forum config">molch.b at googlemail.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Sun Mar 25 08:24:31 CEST 2012</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="004312.html">[Mageia-sysadm] [forums-discuss] Re: updating sysadmin privileges in forum config
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="004315.html">[Mageia-sysadm] [forums-discuss] Re: updating sysadmin privileges in forum config
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#4314">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#4314">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#4314">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#4314">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>2012/3/24 Michael Scherer &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-sysadm">misc at zarb.org</A>&gt;:
+&gt;<i> Le samedi 24 mars 2012 &#224; 12:48 +0100, Wolfgang Bornath a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> But I doubt
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> there would be benefits by having a package for the forum software.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Quite to the contrary, a simple change of a character in one of the
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> php files would cause the need of an update of the whole package,
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> while as is you just need to exchange this one php file. If there
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> would be a benefit I guess there would have been phpBB packages for
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> years, phpBB being the most popular forum software, not only in the
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Linux world. Ok, a weak point, I admit.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> The point is indeed weak.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> For the start, having a package would ease the testing, since right now,
+</I>&gt;<i> people just have no clue on how to replicate our setup. There is the
+</I>&gt;<i> puppet manifests, but I take for granted that the intersection of those
+</I>&gt;<i> that know how to use them and those interested into testing phpbb is
+</I>&gt;<i> near 0.
+</I>
+Right. Why? Because even those who have experience in phpBB forum
+maintenance and php are not familiar of the setup used at Mageia.
+
+&gt;<i> Second part of having a package is that it would benefit to others if in
+</I>&gt;<i> the distribution. It would also ease the management of version by the QA
+</I>&gt;<i> ( cause if stuff is really important, you want to have it checked before
+</I>&gt;<i> it goes live ).
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Another idea is to detect when there is change in the php files, by
+</I>&gt;<i> using the rpm -V feature. That's quite handy when there is a problem
+</I>&gt;<i> ( again speaking of experience ).
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> And having a rpm in the distribution also mean that we can benefit from
+</I>&gt;<i> the whole framework on making sure this is up to date, making sure that
+</I>&gt;<i> basic quality is respected, etc. Something that is far from being the
+</I>&gt;<i> case with a random zip taken from the web, especially from php software.
+</I>&gt;<i> And I do not even talk of more complex security system like tomoyo or
+</I>&gt;<i> selinux.
+</I>
+Well, the phpBB community is very large, involving people on all
+levels of knowledge related to web applications and system
+administration. Regarding the software being released from them as not
+up to date and far from basic quality seems to me a bit ...
+&quot;exaggerating&quot;.
+
+&gt;&gt;<i> &#160;- How would you implement requested features which are not available
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> in the forum software other than by &quot;MODs&quot; (which is the same as a
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> patch?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Usually, with well designed software, that work with plugins. Of course,
+</I>&gt;<i> with some stuff, that goes by &quot;let's duplicate the source code and deal
+</I>&gt;<i> with merging source code update&quot;. There is ton of example of why this is
+</I>&gt;<i> wrong ( search &quot;technical debt&quot; on a search engine for lots of articles
+</I>&gt;<i> on the topic ), hence the need to use a software properly designed, and
+</I>&gt;<i> to stay in a well designed process.
+</I>
+Ok, so your point is that phpBB is not the software you want to use.
+This is a point I understand and would accept, you explained the
+points very well. But I don't know if there is a software with same
+functionality which would qualify and if there is it would mean a lot
+of work to switch.
+
+&gt;<i> And frankly, the whole idea of mod is a sign that phpbb is not suitable
+</I>&gt;<i> out of the box, as I said in the past. So while maybe the others are not
+</I>&gt;<i> either, that's still a signal that something is wrong.
+</I>
+Ok, what can be done about that?
+
+&gt;<i> From my point of view, everybody can open a bug report or send patches.
+</I>&gt;<i> No one did, and you can say as much as you want &quot;this is not my fault&quot;,
+</I>&gt;<i> that will not change anything nor retroactively make bug reports appear.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I would add that if people have a pretension to become admin or
+</I>&gt;<i> anything, they should at least attempt to act as such. Ie, sending
+</I>&gt;<i> patchs, etc.
+</I>
+I haven't met anybody in the international forum with a pretention to
+become admin in the way you see it.
+
+&gt;<i> No, the discussion started because no one did the job. We are not
+</I>&gt;<i> Mandriva, there is not &quot;someone is in charge so I do nothing&quot; bullshit
+</I>&gt;<i> state of mind with the company and the rest of the world separation. The
+</I>&gt;<i> system is open enough that someone skilled enough and motivated enough
+</I>&gt;<i> can do most of the job, except the last step.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> If people were really concerned on contributing instead of speaking how
+</I>&gt;<i> they would want to do something or how others didn't do what they
+</I>&gt;<i> wanted, they would have done something.
+</I>
+Yes, all correct in general and it would surely have happened like
+this in the Mageia forum as well. But:
+If there is an admin in place (even somebody who claims that there are
+enough admins), if this admin keeps responding to questions in the
+forum about a missing update and other requests by explaining how it
+will be done and what is needed and that it will be done as soon as
+possible - why should anyone of the users should write a bug report?
+
+Of course I can only speak for myself. There was a time when I was
+concerned on contributing, especially in the forum area. But after
+some discussions I got the impression that ma&#226;t did not need
+contributions. I do not insist on contributing if it seems to be not
+wanted by the person who was the responsible person for this area. If
+you regard this to be caused by my ego, no problem.
+
+Overall I agree to most of your points after your explanations, thx
+for taking the time.
+
+--
+wobo
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="004312.html">[Mageia-sysadm] [forums-discuss] Re: updating sysadmin privileges in forum config
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="004315.html">[Mageia-sysadm] [forums-discuss] Re: updating sysadmin privileges in forum config
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#4314">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#4314">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#4314">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#4314">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-sysadm">More information about the Mageia-sysadm
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>