summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120129/006360.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120129/006360.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120129/006360.html195
1 files changed, 195 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120129/006360.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120129/006360.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..93262739c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120129/006360.html
@@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] [Poll] What are your top requirements?
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20%5BPoll%5D%20What%20are%20your%20top%20requirements%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C1327842334.2844.65.camel%40liliana.cdg.redhat.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="006356.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="006364.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-discuss] [Poll] What are your top requirements?</H1>
+ <B>Michael Scherer</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20%5BPoll%5D%20What%20are%20your%20top%20requirements%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C1327842334.2844.65.camel%40liliana.cdg.redhat.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] [Poll] What are your top requirements?">misc at zarb.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Sun Jan 29 14:05:34 CET 2012</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006356.html">[Mageia-discuss] [Poll] What are your top requirements?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="006364.html">[Mageia-discuss] [Poll] What are your top requirements?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#6360">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#6360">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#6360">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#6360">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Le dimanche 29 janvier 2012 &#224; 06:11 +0100, Wolfgang Bornath a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i> 2012/1/28 Michael Scherer &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">misc at zarb.org</A>&gt;:
+</I>
+&gt;<i> &gt; While I appreciate Wobo efforts to get meaningful numbers, I am rather
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; doubtful about a few things. First, the choice of questions make me
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; wonder, since my memories tell me that for doing such kind of polls, you
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; first need to do preliminary research to find the options.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> The questions are a result of reading user's postings for quite some years.
+</I>
+So basically, that's &quot;because I know that's this, based on what I
+remember&quot;. But the formal methodology is a little bit more complex than
+that, mainly to avoid any specific bias due to the selection by the
+peson doing the poll.
+
+For example, the diversity of the group may be important, as well as the
+cultural norms. If you focus just on forums, you focus just on a certain
+type of users. Having numbers to present is also usually important to
+show your result as meaningful.
+
+&gt;<i> &gt; There is for example various things like :
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &quot;networking out of the box&quot;, and &quot;good hardware recognition&quot; that are
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; the same.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Not at all. Example: my wifi hardware is recognized out of the box but
+</I>&gt;<i> it is a drag to get it working.
+</I>
+Then why treat networking differently than any others functions like
+printing ?
+And what make you think that your specific issue is not linked to
+hardware problem ?
+
+Good hardware goes beyond &quot;the interface appear in ifconfig, therefore,
+it is supported perfectly&quot;. That's usually the contrary, the whole
+drakxnet/wpa_supplicant/whatever bit work for some people and not from
+others, and the only stuff that change is the wifi chipset. That's
+likely a hardware support issue. Main developer of Network Manager
+explained that on his blog. People often tend to think that nm is
+broken, while the problem is usually a bug in the driver that is
+triggered by nm.
+
+Hence, the question do not depict exactly what should be improved, just
+what some people think the problem is, without giving more informations
+on exactly the problem is. The poll is not the right tool for that, the
+bugzilla is ( and we are fully aware of the bugs that are reported ).
+
+&gt;<i> &gt; And LTS go hand to hand with &quot;stable as top priority&quot; ( since LTS mean
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; the system do not change for a long time, and usually, once enough bugs
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; are fixed, softwares are rather stable ).
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Not the same.
+</I>
+One is a consequence of the other, in my vision of a LTS ( and that's
+also the vision of Canonical, which is basically the only definition we
+have of LTS so far ). And as seen on Mandriva list or on the forum, LTS
+mean nothing for some users, and mean different things for different
+people ( ie, long term, how much is this ? support, what do it entail
+exactly ? ).
+
+For people that see LTS as &quot;I never reinstall and get new versions of
+some stuff&quot;, there is a poll item. For those that say &quot;I never reinstall
+and system do not move&quot;, there is a poll item.
+
+So LTS can ( and rightfully ) be seen as a technical detail to achieve
+what people want, hence the few vote ( which doesn't reflect what people
+asked in others time ).
+
+&gt;<i> &gt; Not to mention that a poll may give incorrect expectation to people, and
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; usually only measure a fraction of the users.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Yes, same as elections and marketing surveys.
+</I>
+Except for elections, you know who you ask and how many people, and
+that's to select someone, based on a large corpus of proposition, that's
+rather different.
+
+So that's more like a marketing survey, without enough detailed
+information ( like &quot;we asked to people who are this age, this gender,
+this level of skills ). We will know what some people want, but not who
+they are. And without knowing who they are, we will not know if they are
+the ones we want, if the survey results are biased, or what kind of bias
+we should be careful of.
+
+For example, do we want to listen to people that are here since the
+start, or not ? To people that are outside of the current community, or
+those that are unsatisfied with their current distribution ?
+
+&gt;<i> &gt; And more importantly, it doesn't help us on the crucial thing ( IMHO ),
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; how to expend the contributeurs pool.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; I think asking &quot;where would you want to put efforts in the next year for
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Mageia&quot; would allow us to better see what kind of priority we should
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; have to grow the community. ( followed by discussions of &quot;why don't you
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; do it now&quot; that would help finding potential weak spots in the system ).
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; This or asking directly, &quot;why don't you work on $FOO&quot;. Users will come
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; when we have a great product ( ie, grow naturally up to a point ). And
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; product will be great with enough contribution, hence the focus on that.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> This was never the goal of this poll.
+</I>
+I know this is not. However, that's a poll that would be more useful,
+since again, our first and foremost goal is to have contributions.
+Without this, the rest will not be
+
+&gt;<i> Why don't you start such a poll yourself?
+</I>
+You mean &quot;why don't I start a vast social engineering campaign to
+recruit contributers ? &quot;
+
+I already do it ( but I guess people do not see it ), but I never go to
+forums. I would not like people to step on my toes on sysadmin side, so
+I have the politeness of letting those that run the forums to take care
+of that.
+
+&gt;<i> @ALL: Thx for your opinions though I wish you'd offer these there
+</I>&gt;<i> where the poll is and not where I merely gave a pointer to the poll.
+</I>
+Personally, I will continue here because the lack of thread in forum
+will make hard to have a meaningful discussion. I answered to the poll,
+and to the forum, but I do not think I can be as precise ( or read
+&quot;verbose&quot;) there than I am on the ml.
+--
+Michael Scherer
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006356.html">[Mageia-discuss] [Poll] What are your top requirements?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="006364.html">[Mageia-discuss] [Poll] What are your top requirements?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#6360">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#6360">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#6360">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#6360">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>