summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-August/008547.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-August/008547.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-August/008547.html139
1 files changed, 139 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-August/008547.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-August/008547.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..6c4527c52
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/2012-August/008547.html
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] UEFI and Secure Boot
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20UEFI%20and%20Secure%20Boot&In-Reply-To=%3C50362443.6060505%40laposte.net%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="008546.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="008549.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-discuss] UEFI and Secure Boot</H1>
+ <B>andre999</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20UEFI%20and%20Secure%20Boot&In-Reply-To=%3C50362443.6060505%40laposte.net%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] UEFI and Secure Boot">andre999mga at laposte.net
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Thu Aug 23 14:38:27 CEST 2012</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008546.html">[Mageia-discuss] UEFI and Secure Boot
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="008549.html">[Mageia-discuss] UEFI and Secure Boot
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#8547">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#8547">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#8547">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#8547">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Morgan Leijstr&#246;m a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i> onsdagen den 22 augusti 2012 21.43.07 skrev Rene Rasmussen:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:51:31 +0100, Maurice Batey wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 18:35:09 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> To be honest, I'm not competent to start replacing chips on
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> a RAM board, either.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> It's a bit scary the first time, but if you follow one of the
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> really helpful video clips out there on the 'net, it's not a big
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> deal.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> The main importance (apart from using the correct chip!) is to keep
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> your fingers from direct contact with the chip, to avoid any static
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> charge jumping across.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> To this point i do not fully agree; Metal tools give much stronger discharge
+</I>&gt;<i> than fingers. But a reason to avoid toucing is to avoid contaminating around
+</I>&gt;<i> pins with sweat (salt, acid), fat and other dirt.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I have conductive plastic pliers for component handling, but they do not have
+</I>&gt;<i> such firm grip as metal pliers.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Then there are more expensive metalpliers with conductive plastic handles
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> (conductive in this case means very very sightlyu conductive not measureabla
+</I>&gt;<i> using standard multimeter, as it should avoid hard discharge, - just slowly
+</I>&gt;<i> bleed away the charge)
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> None of the options described is as important as avoiding charges to build up.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> In my workshop (i build electronics prototypes) i avoid clothes of synthetic
+</I>&gt;<i> fabric, wear conductive slippers - if any, have conductive carpet, and
+</I>&gt;<i> conductive mat on the relevant tables. But those are expensive is sold as
+</I>&gt;<i> such. I have measured some cheaper rubber mats are good too.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> The less expensive approach is to use a wristband.
+</I>&gt;<i> A plus is to avoid sunthetic clothing, and you could work on such pink bubble
+</I>&gt;<i> palstic wrapping some electronics come with, it is antistatic. Avoid metal
+</I>&gt;<i> and plastic table, prefer untreated wood.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Or set up an anti-static workplace. That would be the correct thing to
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> do.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Static discharges are probably responsible for 90% of all electronics
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> going bad.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> (not counting design errors. My favourite complaint is that designers put
+</I>&gt;<i> eletrolytics unecerrarily close to hot components - the most common repair we
+</I>&gt;<i> do is to replace such.)
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> ESD damages are not always immediately noticeable, but often age the component
+</I>&gt;<i> so it have less life left (simply speaking)
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> I never touch any of my computer or electronics parts without my ESD
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> wristband securely connected to my workspace.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> (having worked with electronics professionally for most of my life has
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> taught me that!)
+</I>
+Sounds like good advice for 20 or 30 years ago, before chips normally had
+tristate buffers and a common floor covering was those polyestre carpets which
+were so good for rubbing your feet on so you could give an unsuspecting victim
+a shock by touching them.
+Chip technology has advanced enormously. Much circuitry is wave-soldered to
+the process board, thus even more immune to static discharge and dirt.
+And those cheap static-producing carpets are a lot rarer.
+Single chips with delicate pins are also a lot rarer.
+Static charge is more likely to disrupt a functioning system, rather than cause
+any physical damage.
+
+I'd say the biggest risk to electronics today is damaging a process board by
+flexing it too much.
+I'd prefer a soft cardboard surface to anything else. (Protects both the
+surface beneath and the electronics, and doesn't create a static charge.)
+
+&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> regards,
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Rene
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>
+--
+Andr&#233;
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008546.html">[Mageia-discuss] UEFI and Secure Boot
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="008549.html">[Mageia-discuss] UEFI and Secure Boot
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#8547">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#8547">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#8547">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#8547">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>