summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20111007/005584.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20111007/005584.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20111007/005584.html95
1 files changed, 95 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20111007/005584.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20111007/005584.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a2d9972cc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20111007/005584.html
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Why would runlevel 3 take more power?
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Why%20would%20runlevel%203%20take%20more%20power%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4E8EDE09.5060809%40earthlink.net%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="005586.html">
+
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-discuss] Why would runlevel 3 take more power?</H1>
+ <B>ed</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Why%20would%20runlevel%203%20take%20more%20power%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4E8EDE09.5060809%40earthlink.net%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Why would runlevel 3 take more power?">etharp at earthlink.net
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Fri Oct 7 13:10:01 CEST 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005586.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mageia review with bad experience
+</A></li>
+
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#5584">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#5584">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#5584">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#5584">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>On 10/04/2011 08:39 PM, blind Pete wrote:
+&gt;<i> on Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:35
+</I>&gt;<i> in the Usenet newsgroup gmane.linux.mageia.user
+</I>&gt;<i> Norman Carver wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Set up a new server for home use (DNS, files, etc.) and
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> was gratified to find it using around 50 watts when the
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> older machine it replaces was using around 90.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> However, just before sticking it in the closet, I changed
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> it to runlevel 3 since I won't be using the GUI typically.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> I had assumed this might reduce power usage a bit
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> more, but surprisingly it caused the power draw to go UP
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> by about 3 watts! I thought it a fluke, but verified that
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> this is a real phenomenon: the machine draws about
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> 3 watts less when X and KDE are running than when
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> they are not. Seems like running more processes should
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> cause more power usage. Any ideas what might be
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> causing what I see? Odd.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> I note that:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> (1) I set kernel scaling_governor parameter for
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> each core to ondemand for any runlevel;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> (2) whether logged into KDE or just sitting at the
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> DM the power usage is stabilizes at the same level
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> when in runlevel 5;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> (3) I have not made any power settings in KDE and
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> the power applet is not running;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> (4) runlevel 5 has all the same services as runleve 5
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> plus: dm and atieventsd.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Thanks for any insights!
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Norm
+</I>&gt;<i> Can you measure the power consumption of the monitor
+</I>&gt;<i> separately? Or anything else that is plugged into
+</I>&gt;<i> the system. If you like mucking around for the fun
+</I>&gt;<i> of mucking around, try unplugging things.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>post the output from [as root]
+&quot;diff /etc/rc.d/rc3.d /etc/rc.d/rc5.d&quot;
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005586.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mageia review with bad experience
+</A></li>
+
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#5584">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#5584">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#5584">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#5584">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>