summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101102/002838.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101102/002838.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101102/002838.html144
1 files changed, 144 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101102/002838.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101102/002838.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c6b221537
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101102/002838.html
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] ISO 0 specification
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20ISO%200%20specification&In-Reply-To=%3C201011021326.36457.maarten.vanraes%40gmail.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002836.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="002837.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-discuss] ISO 0 specification</H1>
+ <B>Maarten Vanraes</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20ISO%200%20specification&In-Reply-To=%3C201011021326.36457.maarten.vanraes%40gmail.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] ISO 0 specification">maarten.vanraes at gmail.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Tue Nov 2 13:26:36 CET 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002836.html">[Mageia-discuss] ISO 0 specification
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002837.html">[Mageia-discuss] Interview de Anne Nicolas pour Mageia [french]
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#2838">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#2838">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#2838">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#2838">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Op dinsdag 02 november 2010 13:13:17 schreef Michael Scherer:
+&gt;<i> Le mardi 02 novembre 2010 &#224; 09:20 +0100, Maarten Vanraes a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; I read the full meeting logs from 25/10, and i noticed tmb saying:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &quot;pretty much a cooker snapshot&quot;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; I donno how far you're going to take this; but i thought we would be
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; getting a new version out ASAP.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; in my understanding, we would get a 2010.1 snapshot and use it to build
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; the first ISO.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; and use the cooker snapshot to get a cauldron.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; imo the cooker is sooo unstable and broken, we will not be able to get a
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; working ISO from it, that is more or less stable in this timeframe.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; eg:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; * KDE
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; * glib
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; * perl
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; * python
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; * RPM
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; * ...
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; most of these will get fixed, in time; but what about ALL the packages
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; depending on that? most of the packages aren't even maintained...
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> They are not more maintained on 2010.1 than on cooker.
+</I>
+exactly, but on 2010.1 those might still &quot;work&quot;.
+
+&gt;<i> &gt; personally, i'm against using cooker to make a stable ISO 0.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> why that's what we do all the time, after a stabilisation period. It
+</I>&gt;<i> worked fine for the last 7 years, and that's a part of the process that
+</I>&gt;<i> is used by lots of distributions. ( have a devel tree, fork it for
+</I>&gt;<i> release, bug fix, release it ). There is slightly different variations
+</I>&gt;<i> ( fedora and no frozen rawhide, debian and testing/stable/unstable ),
+</I>&gt;<i> but all do the same, basically.
+</I>
+i am not against a stabilisation period
+
+&gt;<i> &gt; rebranding a 2010.1 will be lots more stable; and maintime we will have
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; the time to make cauldron (from cooker) into something good, so we will
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; be able to make a release based on cauldron on the 18th of september.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> But it would be less appealing, and this would make the life of the
+</I>&gt;<i> communication team slightly difficult. It would also mean getting older
+</I>&gt;<i> hardware support, older versions of various components ( like python,
+</I>&gt;<i> for example ).
+</I>
+that is true
+
+&gt;<i> And this would not save anything, as the bugfix work will have to be
+</I>&gt;<i> done anyway sooner or later.
+</I>
+also true
+
+&gt;<i> More ever, the experience showed that if you give more time to fix bugs,
+</I>&gt;<i> bugs just take more time to be fixed ( aka, we are lazy ). The more
+</I>&gt;<i> visible evidence is the activity in Mandriva when a deadline appear &quot;we
+</I>&gt;<i> will now freeze the version update&quot;, where suddenly everybody update
+</I>&gt;<i> everything ( while we could have done sooner )
+</I>
+i didn't think of this, i suppose you have a valid point here
+
+&gt;<i> And postponing to september ( ie 6 months later ) will be imho more
+</I>&gt;<i> problematic, as this will add the current cooker breakage to the one
+</I>&gt;<i> introduced by all the changes that people will want to push in the 6
+</I>&gt;<i> months ( gnome 3, etc, etc ). We have already experience with the
+</I>&gt;<i> current 6 months cycles, but we do not really have with a 1 year cycle,
+</I>&gt;<i> and this may cause trouble.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> So it is better to split the work into small time based chunks, because
+</I>&gt;<i> that's something we know, and we should avoid surprise to start the
+</I>&gt;<i> distribution.
+</I>
+this is why i proposed using 2010.1 as basis
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002836.html">[Mageia-discuss] ISO 0 specification
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002837.html">[Mageia-discuss] Interview de Anne Nicolas pour Mageia [french]
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#2838">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#2838">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#2838">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#2838">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>