diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101102/002832.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101102/002832.html | 95 |
1 files changed, 95 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101102/002832.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101102/002832.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..499901a76 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101102/002832.html @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Suggestions for the ISO + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Suggestions%20for%20the%20ISO&In-Reply-To=%3C201011021252.25537.fri%40tribun.eu%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002828.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="002834.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions for the ISO</H1> + <B>Morgan Leijström</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Suggestions%20for%20the%20ISO&In-Reply-To=%3C201011021252.25537.fri%40tribun.eu%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions for the ISO">fri at tribun.eu + </A><BR> + <I>Tue Nov 2 12:52:25 CET 2010</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002828.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions for the ISO +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002834.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions for the ISO +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#2832">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#2832">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#2832">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#2832">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>Den 2010-11-02 12:00:57 skrev Frank Griffin: +><i>Backports are often not even tested by the person building the rpm. +</I> +That does not sound good, but regardless : + +It should not include backports, only updates + +><i> > What difference is there between someone who installs from the original +</I>><i> > release CD and then applies updates vs. installing from a CD where the +</I>><i> > updates are already included? +</I>><i> +</I>><i> In the first case, you can roll back the update. If all you've got is +</I>><i> two ISOs, and you're unfamiliar enough with CLI rpm to be using ISOs to +</I>><i> begin with, you're screwed unless you reinstall (or kept the old image, +</I>><i> which newbies are unlikely to do). +</I> +I hope updates are checked carefully enough as they are passed to every normal +user doing updates. So i believe the average updated package should be +better than release version. + +Actually, the big install base could be used to *increase* the quality of +updated versions over the release version: +If users notice problems with an update: avoid it in the updated ISO. +(That also mean updates newer than a few days should never enter the updated +iso) + +Practically, at Mageia the automatic thingy gathers all updates except the +last few days, then some are manually removed if ther is any problems, then +some dependency checks, iso build, light test, release. + +</PRE> + + + + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002828.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions for the ISO +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002834.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions for the ISO +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#2832">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#2832">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#2832">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#2832">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |