diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101024/002592.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101024/002592.html | 118 |
1 files changed, 118 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101024/002592.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101024/002592.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b11576d47 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101024/002592.html @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Suggestions + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Suggestions&In-Reply-To=%3CPine.LNX.4.44.1010240421090.17350-100000%40outpost-priv%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002590.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="002594.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions</H1> + <B>Tux99</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Suggestions&In-Reply-To=%3CPine.LNX.4.44.1010240421090.17350-100000%40outpost-priv%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions">tux99-mga at uridium.org + </A><BR> + <I>Sun Oct 24 04:40:26 CEST 2010</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002590.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002594.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#2592">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#2592">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#2592">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#2592">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>On Sun, 24 Oct 2010, Michael Scherer wrote: + +><i> I think I demonstrated in the past that constant friendliness toward +</I>><i> users is not one of my distinctive characteristics. +</I> +Well, that might have been fine as a Mandriva employee, but as part of a +community distro I personally consider you attitude out of place and not +in line with the spirit of Mageia. + +><i> If writing a decent description is easy and almost effortless, and if +</I>><i> sending a email is easy, then what is difficult into doing both ? +</I> +You don't even need to write a description, usually you can just +copy&paste it from the web site of the software. +Thing is, if the packager does it it's a 1 minute job, if some user +emails it to him, the packager still has to check the description and +then paste it into the spec file, so it saves no time at all. + +><i> We could rely on the packagers for everything, but 1) that doesn't scale +</I>><i> 2) that doesn't work. +</I> +With all due respect, but when talking about a simple description for +each package this is nonsense. + +><i> And that doesn't work because packagers ( at least me ) most of the time +</I>><i> do not read descriptions, so they do not see something is wrong. +</I> +What descriptions do you not read? +The ones of Fedora spec files you simply copy&paste? + +><i> Managing and knowing softwares is our duty, which place use in a +</I>><i> position far away from someone that discover the system. +</I> +Exactly because the packager knows the software he/she packages, it's +easiest for her/him to add a suitable description. + +><i> Kde had 3 majors releases since I started to use Linux, so of course +</I>><i> the packages descriptions change, yet I didn't read them since years. +</I> +I don't understand your point, you surely didn't use the same spec +files for most kde4 packages as for kde3? + +><i> So again, why does people do not send improved description ? +</I> +Finding who the correct packager is, isn't trivial at all, the changelog +often contains various names and the Mdv web site packager list often +doesn't match the names in the spec file. + +I tell you what: + +If I will have full access to all spec files as a Mageia packager, I +will myself add descriptions to many packages if others don't mind, I +don't have a problem with that as long as I can do it directly myself, +without having to contact each fellow packager first. + +But if I have to find the email of the packager for each package that +has a bad or missing description then I won't bother, that would be a +waste of everyone's time. + +</PRE> + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002590.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002594.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#2592">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#2592">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#2592">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#2592">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |