summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101013/002394.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101013/002394.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101013/002394.html74
1 files changed, 74 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101013/002394.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101013/002394.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..bab6e65c4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101013/002394.html
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Wish List
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Wish%20List&In-Reply-To=%3C41f.4cb4ef7a%40mageia.linuxtech.net%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="002357.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-discuss] Wish List</H1>
+ <B>Rick Stockton</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Wish%20List&In-Reply-To=%3C41f.4cb4ef7a%40mageia.linuxtech.net%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Wish List">rickstockton at reno-computerhelp.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Wed Oct 13 01:30:03 CEST 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002357.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mageia/AUFML at the Free Software Days in Lyon, France
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#2394">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#2394">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#2394">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#2394">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>
+
+I wish that the 'Release Naming Scheme' could be isolated to a separate
+Thread, because wish-list suggestions for software are becoming buried.
+But I have thoughts on this topic, here they are:
+
+I think that the primary &quot;attractions&quot; of a Year-based naming scheme
+(2011.0, 2011.1, etc.) are (A) the fact that Mandriva has been using it
+for many years; (B) the marketing advantage of a name which
+[i]automatically[/i] indicates the software to be new and sexy, &quot;this
+year's model&quot;; and (C) the fact that still provides a relatively simple
+way to sort RPMs by Release. But I strongly, [b]strongly[/b] dislike the
+notion of skipping digits to indicate a &quot;Month&quot; or &quot;Quarter&quot; of the
+Release. Too tricky, too obscure, and leaves everyone wondering &quot;did I
+miss something&quot;?
+
+In contrast, The Fedora Method is really, really good: Ultra-easy sorting
+and string-based selection; no embarrassing indication that you're &quot;late&quot;
+in finalizing your Release. And so, unless matching Mandriva RPM names is
+really important, I suggest to follow the examples of Fedora and
+Microsoft: Use whole numbers, they're ultra-simple.
+</PRE>
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002357.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mageia/AUFML at the Free Software Days in Lyon, France
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#2394">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#2394">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#2394">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#2394">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>