summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101007/002264.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101007/002264.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101007/002264.html111
1 files changed, 111 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101007/002264.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101007/002264.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..4719edc54
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101007/002264.html
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Wish List
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Wish%20List&In-Reply-To=%3C4CAD5549.2090301%40laposte.net%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002261.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="002265.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-discuss] Wish List</H1>
+ <B>andr&#233;</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Wish%20List&In-Reply-To=%3C4CAD5549.2090301%40laposte.net%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Wish List">andr55 at laposte.net
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Thu Oct 7 07:06:17 CEST 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002261.html">[Mageia-discuss] mageia logo: my proposals
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002265.html">[Mageia-discuss] Wish List
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#2264">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#2264">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#2264">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#2264">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Marc Par&#233; a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Le 2010-10-02 18:24, Andr&#233; Machado a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> Mageia 23, Mageia 37. Sounds good? At least for me it doesn't :)
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Fedora 14 beta is out. Slackware 13.1, too. But when we get there, we
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> can improvise. We can do like Corel DRAW! X4 , that has a impact name
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> and is the 14th version (X4 = X + 4 and X is 10 in Roman numerals). Or
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> we can use both, eg: M$ Office 2010 is, internally, Office 14.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> For more than a version to year, we can use months, sequential numbers
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> or a strange numbering system like Mageia 1.0.20110101 where last part
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> is YYYYMMDD.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Whichever numbering system is used, it should be easily understood by
+</I>&gt;<i> the average user and it should not look like it is making the previous
+</I>&gt;<i> version sound like an inferior product. I personally don't mind the
+</I>&gt;<i> year assignation &quot;Mageia 2010.1&quot; followed by &quot;Magiea 2010.2&quot; which, to
+</I>&gt;<i> me, is easily explainable to everyone ... &quot;Mageia 2010.1&quot; is the first
+</I>&gt;<i> release of Mageia in 2010 and &quot;Mageia 2010.2&quot; is the second release of
+</I>&gt;<i> Mageia in 2010.
+</I>As far as the year designation goes, I definitely think that we should
+use the actual year, instead of copying the car industry with something
+like 2011.0 for late 2010.
+Personally I have some preference for using 2011.0 in March and 2011.1
+in October, but 2011.1 and 2011.2 format would be ok.
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> It should be a numbering system that is easily understood regardless
+</I>&gt;<i> of country, culture or age. A 10 year-old and 90 year-old should be
+</I>&gt;<i> able to guess and understand the system easily. This could then be our
+</I>&gt;<i> &quot;public&quot; numbering system. Easily read and easily understood.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> As to the Cauldron, dev etc. versions, then it could very well be a
+</I>&gt;<i> more descriptive numbering system based on day/month/year (the metric
+</I>&gt;<i> date format) Mageia09022010. This could then be our &quot;dev&quot; and
+</I>&gt;<i> &quot;internal&quot; numbering system. We would, of course, promote the fact,
+</I>&gt;<i> that our develop system dating and numbering system would follow the
+</I>&gt;<i> long established metric formats.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Marc
+</I>The date format should be year/month/day, as in 20100209. This is the
+official order used by the UN, for example.
+It is also used by Mozilla products, and much other software. There is
+also a gradual conversion to this format by many international
+companies. And much gov't issued id (as in Qu&#233;bec, Canada).
+Day-month-year is the traditional European format.
+
+As far as this dev/internal date goes, there is nothing to prevent it
+from continuing on the official release version, along with the year of
+the release.
+
+- Andr&#233; (andre999)
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002261.html">[Mageia-discuss] mageia logo: my proposals
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002265.html">[Mageia-discuss] Wish List
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#2264">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#2264">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#2264">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#2264">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>