summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101003/001842.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101003/001842.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101003/001842.html110
1 files changed, 110 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101003/001842.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101003/001842.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..07dc2cc2a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101003/001842.html
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Wish List
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Wish%20List&In-Reply-To=%3C201010031036.52767.fri%40tribun.eu%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001845.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001843.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-discuss] Wish List</H1>
+ <B>Morgan Leijstr&#246;m</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Wish%20List&In-Reply-To=%3C201010031036.52767.fri%40tribun.eu%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Wish List">fri at tribun.eu
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Sun Oct 3 10:36:52 CEST 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001845.html">[Mageia-discuss] Wish List
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001843.html">[Mageia-discuss] Wish List
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1842">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1842">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1842">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1842">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Den 2010-10-02 23:26:19 skrev Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI:
+
+&gt;<i> I question whether we should be iron-bound to a fixed number, of
+</I>&gt;<i> whether we should wheel out a new release when it is ready and fit for
+</I>&gt;<i> consumption.
+</I>
+I agree.
+
+First, i do not like date-named versions at all.
+
+Why not just increment the number each release.
+Mageia 1, Mageia 2 etc ?
+
+Second, releases should be stable!
+
+So goals should be set for &quot;next version&quot; but not carved in stone.
+For example if KDE6 still is not stable when Mageia is sheduled for release
+including KDE6 it should either be delayed until stable, changed to stable
+version and released. And task-upgradet-KDE6 in testing, and when stable in
+backport.
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001845.html">[Mageia-discuss] Wish List
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001843.html">[Mageia-discuss] Wish List
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1842">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1842">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1842">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1842">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>