diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100928/001506.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100928/001506.html | 105 |
1 files changed, 105 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100928/001506.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100928/001506.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..cc7c758c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100928/001506.html @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Package management system + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Package%20management%20system&In-Reply-To=%3C201009282020.37385.richard.j.walker%40ntlworld.com%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001508.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001511.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-discuss] Package management system</H1> + <B>Richard</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Package%20management%20system&In-Reply-To=%3C201009282020.37385.richard.j.walker%40ntlworld.com%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Package management system">richard.j.walker at ntlworld.com + </A><BR> + <I>Tue Sep 28 21:20:37 CEST 2010</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001508.html">[Mageia-discuss] Package management system +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001511.html">[Mageia-discuss] Package management system +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#1506">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#1506">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#1506">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#1506">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>On Tuesday 28 September 2010 19:34:09 Thomas Lottmann wrote: +><i> > Le mardi 28 septembre 2010 à 20:02 +0200, nicolas vigier a écrit : +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > So, for people who are not happy with the default, do not hesitate to +</I>><i> > test others packages managers and report issues ( for example, yum does +</I>><i> > requires specific indexes that we do not provides at mandriva, but we +</I>><i> > could add them if required, i guess ). +</I>><i> +</I>><i> ...[s]ince then, looking at Smart's GUI, it looks like it has not been +</I>><i> significantly improved since a long time. Lookign in the package's +</I>><i> history, the fixes show it is maintained only to prevent it from being +</I>><i> broken... +</I>><i> +</I>><i>... I know there are several people who are not satisfied with RPMDrake, +</I>><i> this because they prefer to have a package manager with a different +</I>><i> philosophy or other kind if conception. I believe Smart could then be +</I>><i> improved both in text and GUI if people are encouraged to develop and +</I>><i> work on it. It could offer yet another approach then for package +</I>><i> management. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Skiper +</I> +I confess to a quite high level of ignorance about package managers, as I have +only ever known and used rpmdrake in its evolution since around 2000, but you +have both said things to make me think that some of the frustrations I have +experienced since 2008 Spring may be due to controllable features of the +package manager. + +The simplest analysis tells us that rpmdrake does its job admirably; point, +click and presto, your software is installed (OK, you may have to click a +couple more times to agree to the selected packages list). + +How much better could it possibly do this? What am I missing? You have both +mentioned alternatives, some of which I know by name, but in what way do apt, +yum or smart do this job any better? + +I realise that package managers are needed because humans have to add some +intelligence in the form of what libraries are needed to get a program to +run. I also know that sometimes humans get this badly wrong (try removing a +library that you know will never be used and ask yourself why rpmdrake wants +to remove over 200 packages with it!). Do other package managers manage to +avoid this embarassing and frustrating behaviour? or is it that it is just +easier to get it right with package types other than rpm? + +Richard +</PRE> + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001508.html">[Mageia-discuss] Package management system +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001511.html">[Mageia-discuss] Package management system +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#1506">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#1506">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#1506">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#1506">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |