summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110614/27b02af6
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110614/27b02af6')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110614/27b02af6/attachment-0001.html21
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110614/27b02af6/attachment.html21
2 files changed, 42 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110614/27b02af6/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110614/27b02af6/attachment-0001.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..80ee8a859
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110614/27b02af6/attachment-0001.html
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/6/14 Christiaan Welvaart <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:cjw@daneel.dyndns.org">cjw@daneel.dyndns.org</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
+<div class="im">On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Thorsten van Lil wrote:<br>
+<br>
+<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
+I don&#39;t want a full rolling release, because of the listed disadvantages. So, if you ask me what is &quot;wrong&quot; with Arch, I would say:<br>
+* due to the rolling release, it&#39;s nearly vanilla. This doesn&#39;t match requirements of Mageia<br>
+* no innovations (because of vanilla)<br>
+* a rolling core system has a negative correlation with it&#39;s stability<br>
+* heavy work load<br>
+* ...<br>
+<br>
+So, I don&#39;t ask for a copy of Arch nor any other distribution. I asked (although it wasn&#39;t my idea) for something new. An compromise: a light rolling release.<br>
+</blockquote>
+<br></div>
+This is exactly what release + updates + backports can be, the only requirement is enough people to do the work. I do not understand what people are saying about backports being &quot;unsupported&quot;. IMHO we should either have backports that are supported, with fixes for security issues and important bugs, or no backports.<br>
+</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I guess because of Mandriva policy. We did provide backports but it was explicitely said to be unsupported. &quot;Use it at your own risks&quot;</div><div>We may have to rewrite  this and make things clear</div>
+<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><font color="#888888">
+<br>
+<br>
+    Christiaan<br>
+</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Anne<br><a href="http://www.mageia.org" target="_blank">http://www.mageia.org</a><br>
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110614/27b02af6/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110614/27b02af6/attachment.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..80ee8a859
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110614/27b02af6/attachment.html
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/6/14 Christiaan Welvaart <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:cjw@daneel.dyndns.org">cjw@daneel.dyndns.org</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
+<div class="im">On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Thorsten van Lil wrote:<br>
+<br>
+<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
+I don&#39;t want a full rolling release, because of the listed disadvantages. So, if you ask me what is &quot;wrong&quot; with Arch, I would say:<br>
+* due to the rolling release, it&#39;s nearly vanilla. This doesn&#39;t match requirements of Mageia<br>
+* no innovations (because of vanilla)<br>
+* a rolling core system has a negative correlation with it&#39;s stability<br>
+* heavy work load<br>
+* ...<br>
+<br>
+So, I don&#39;t ask for a copy of Arch nor any other distribution. I asked (although it wasn&#39;t my idea) for something new. An compromise: a light rolling release.<br>
+</blockquote>
+<br></div>
+This is exactly what release + updates + backports can be, the only requirement is enough people to do the work. I do not understand what people are saying about backports being &quot;unsupported&quot;. IMHO we should either have backports that are supported, with fixes for security issues and important bugs, or no backports.<br>
+</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I guess because of Mandriva policy. We did provide backports but it was explicitely said to be unsupported. &quot;Use it at your own risks&quot;</div><div>We may have to rewrite  this and make things clear</div>
+<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><font color="#888888">
+<br>
+<br>
+    Christiaan<br>
+</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Anne<br><a href="http://www.mageia.org" target="_blank">http://www.mageia.org</a><br>