summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/019770.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/019770.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/019770.html205
1 files changed, 205 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/019770.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/019770.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..627c102a0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/019770.html
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Jack1 package missing
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Jack1%20package%20missing&In-Reply-To=%3CCAFgjPJ9Wev1hySYJJ4%3D9pGdD_TpxyvAdY3iLDtqveY-uLAnrKw%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="019757.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="019749.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Jack1 package missing</H1>
+ <B>Jehan Pag&#232;s</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Jack1%20package%20missing&In-Reply-To=%3CCAFgjPJ9Wev1hySYJJ4%3D9pGdD_TpxyvAdY3iLDtqveY-uLAnrKw%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Jack1 package missing">jehan.marmottard at gmail.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Mon Nov 5 03:23:04 CET 2012</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="019757.html">[Mageia-dev] Jack1 package missing
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="019749.html">[Mageia-dev] Rebuilding drakx-installer-stage2
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#19770">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#19770">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#19770">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#19770">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Hi,
+
+
+On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 4:29 AM, andre999 &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">andre999mga at laposte.net</A>&gt; wrote:
+
+&gt;<i> Jehan Pag&#232;s a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Hi,
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 11:11 PM, PhilippeDidier
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">philippedidier at laposte.net</A> &lt;mailto:philippedidier@**laposte.net&lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">philippedidier at laposte.net</A>&gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Jehan Pag&#232;s a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; Hi,
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; I noticed we propose only the Jack2 package, but no Jack1. Yet
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Jack2 is
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; simply another implementation in C++ of the Jack protocol, and not
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> a
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; newer version (as the official website also states clearly:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; <A HREF="http://trac.jackaudio.org/**wiki/Q_differenc_jack1_jack2&lt;http://trac.jackaudio.org/wiki/Q_differenc_jack1_jack2">http://trac.jackaudio.org/**wiki/Q_differenc_jack1_jack2&lt;http://trac.jackaudio.org/wiki/Q_differenc_jack1_jack2</A>&gt;).
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; Plus I had a very annoying bug with Ardour when using Jack2, and
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> people
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; on Ardour mailing list told me it was a known issue with Jack2
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> (both
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; Ardour and Jack2 were installed from the Mageia 2 packages). I
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> compiled
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; Jack1, and it indeed fixed the issue.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; So I am thinking on proposing a spec for Jack1.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; But then I have questions:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; 1/ How should I name this package? The jack2 package is named
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &quot;jackit&quot;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; and I have no idea where you got that from (I guess this is a
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> shorter
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; name for &quot;Jack Audio Connection Kit&quot;, but should we really change
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; package names this way?
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; It is not that long). The official alternative
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; name of Jack2 is &quot;jackdmp&quot; (see README here:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; <A HREF="https://github.com/jackaudio/**jack2&lt;https://github.com/jackaudio/jack2">https://github.com/jackaudio/**jack2&lt;https://github.com/jackaudio/jack2</A>&gt;). I saw nowhere else this
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &quot;jackit&quot;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; naming.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> We inherit this from Mandrake : in the early years of Mandrake a jack
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> package already existed but it had nothing to do with JACK (Jack Audio
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Connexion Kit) : it was a console frontend for cd rippers, still
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> provided in Mageia...
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> When JACK was imported into Mandrake it had to be given an other
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> name...
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> so jackit !!!
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> There was a tonic controversy on Mandrake forum about this in 2003 or
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> 2004 year.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Mandrake and then Mandriva and and then Mageia are the only
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> distributions calling JACK package &quot;jackit&quot; ....
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; So I am questioning the naming of this existing package, and
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> would like
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; to propose some rename along with a new name for a Jack1 package.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; Maybe simply &quot;jack1&quot; and &quot;jack2&quot;? Or &quot;jack&quot; and &quot;jackdmp&quot;?
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; 2/ How should the virtual dependency be named?
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; The existing &quot;jackit&quot; spec provides a &quot;jackit-devel&quot; and a
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &quot;libjack-devel&quot;.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; I think that none of the names are really fit IMO. First jackit
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> for the
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; same reason as before (I don't see where this name comes from),
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> also
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; libjack (and the -devel suffix) because this kit is not *only* a
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> library
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; (there are also the jackd daemon, tools, etc.).
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; I propose simply &quot;jack&quot; as virtual package name.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; How does this sound?
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; Thanks.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; Jehan
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Not simple because of this context ...
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> If you want to call JACK jack you need to remove first the existing
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> jack
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> from the repo, and to modify the spec for every package requiring
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> jackit
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> now, to make them require jack if it is the new package name for JACK
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> .
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Post Scriptum : Reading this I don't know if my explanation is clear
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> enough ...
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> A key to understand what I wrote :
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &quot;jack&quot; is the name of a package (whatever its content is)
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &quot;jackit&quot; is the name of a package
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &quot;JACK&quot; is the recursive acronym (Jack Audio Connexion Kit) of the
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> software you are talking about
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Ok I understood the deal.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> I would personally prefer even a longer package name like
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> jack-audio-connection-kit. Mageia would gain from having clearer naming.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Especially if we add the Jack1 alternative.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Now if this is a big deal, and it generates a controversy again, it is
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> not that a big deal. The question thus is: how do I call Jack1 package
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> then? And can I say that this new package &quot;Provides: jackit&quot; so that it
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> works as an alternative to Jack2 (for instance for Ardour)?
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Thanks.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Jehan
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> why not give jack1 the name :
+</I>&gt;<i> &quot;jack1 - the Jack Audio Connection Kit 1&quot;
+</I>&gt;<i> and modify the description to include :
+</I>&gt;<i> &quot;This is the original C implementation of the Jack Audio Connection Kit
+</I>&gt;<i> protocol (JACK). It is under active development concurrently with jackit
+</I>&gt;<i> (JACK2)&quot;
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>I'll do this like this, then, and propose a SPEC to my mentor, maybe today.
+
+It might also be a good idea to modify the jackit description to indicate
+&gt;<i> that it is concurrent to jack1 as well.
+</I>&gt;<i> And maybe rename it to jack2, if it is not too complicated ?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>I guess the maintainer of this package will have to do this. I'll search
+for his email.
+Thanks all.
+
+Jehan
+
+
+&gt;<i> We could always use provides to accommodate packages requiring JACK.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Just some suggestions ...
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> --
+</I>&gt;<i> Andr&#233;
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>-------------- next part --------------
+An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
+URL: &lt;/pipermail/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/35eded3e/attachment.html&gt;
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="019757.html">[Mageia-dev] Jack1 package missing
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="019749.html">[Mageia-dev] Rebuilding drakx-installer-stage2
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#19770">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#19770">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#19770">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#19770">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>