diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/019770.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/019770.html | 205 | 
1 files changed, 205 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/019770.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/019770.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..627c102a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/019770.html @@ -0,0 +1,205 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> +   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Jack1 package missing +   </TITLE> +   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > +   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Jack1%20package%20missing&In-Reply-To=%3CCAFgjPJ9Wev1hySYJJ4%3D9pGdD_TpxyvAdY3iLDtqveY-uLAnrKw%40mail.gmail.com%3E"> +   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> +   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> +   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="019757.html"> +   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="019749.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> +   <H1>[Mageia-dev] Jack1 package missing</H1> +    <B>Jehan Pagès</B>  +    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Jack1%20package%20missing&In-Reply-To=%3CCAFgjPJ9Wev1hySYJJ4%3D9pGdD_TpxyvAdY3iLDtqveY-uLAnrKw%40mail.gmail.com%3E" +       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Jack1 package missing">jehan.marmottard at gmail.com +       </A><BR> +    <I>Mon Nov  5 03:23:04 CET 2012</I> +    <P><UL> +        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="019757.html">[Mageia-dev] Jack1 package missing +</A></li> +        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="019749.html">[Mageia-dev] Rebuilding drakx-installer-stage2 +</A></li> +         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>  +              <a href="date.html#19770">[ date ]</a> +              <a href="thread.html#19770">[ thread ]</a> +              <a href="subject.html#19770">[ subject ]</a> +              <a href="author.html#19770">[ author ]</a> +         </LI> +       </UL> +    <HR>   +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>Hi, + + +On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 4:29 AM, andre999 <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">andre999mga at laposte.net</A>> wrote: + +><i> Jehan Pagès a écrit : +</I>><i> +</I>>><i> Hi, +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 11:11 PM, PhilippeDidier +</I>>><i> <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">philippedidier at laposte.net</A> <mailto:philippedidier@**laposte.net<<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">philippedidier at laposte.net</A>>>> +</I>>><i> wrote: +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i>     Jehan Pagès a écrit : +</I>>><i>      > Hi, +</I>>><i>      > +</I>>><i>      > I noticed we propose only the Jack2 package, but no Jack1. Yet +</I>>><i>     Jack2 is +</I>>><i>      > simply another implementation in C++ of the Jack protocol, and not +</I>>><i> a +</I>>><i>      > newer version (as the official website also states clearly: +</I>>><i>      > <A HREF="http://trac.jackaudio.org/**wiki/Q_differenc_jack1_jack2<http://trac.jackaudio.org/wiki/Q_differenc_jack1_jack2">http://trac.jackaudio.org/**wiki/Q_differenc_jack1_jack2<http://trac.jackaudio.org/wiki/Q_differenc_jack1_jack2</A>>). +</I>>><i>      > +</I>>><i>      > Plus I had a very annoying bug with Ardour when using Jack2, and +</I>>><i>     people +</I>>><i>      > on Ardour mailing list told me it was a known issue with Jack2 +</I>>><i> (both +</I>>><i>      > Ardour and Jack2 were installed from the Mageia 2 packages). I +</I>>><i>     compiled +</I>>><i>      > Jack1, and it indeed fixed the issue. +</I>>><i>      > +</I>>><i>      > So I am thinking on proposing a spec for Jack1. +</I>>><i>      > +</I>>><i>      > But then I have questions: +</I>>><i>      > +</I>>><i>      > 1/ How should I name this package? The jack2 package is named +</I>>><i>     "jackit" +</I>>><i>      > and I have no idea where you got that from (I guess this is a +</I>>><i> shorter +</I>>><i>      > name for "Jack Audio Connection Kit", but should we really change +</I>>><i>      > package names this way? +</I>>><i>      > It is not that long). The official alternative +</I>>><i>      > name of Jack2 is "jackdmp" (see README here: +</I>>><i>      > <A HREF="https://github.com/jackaudio/**jack2<https://github.com/jackaudio/jack2">https://github.com/jackaudio/**jack2<https://github.com/jackaudio/jack2</A>>). I saw nowhere else this +</I>>><i>     "jackit" +</I>>><i>      > naming. +</I>>><i>      > +</I>>><i>     We inherit this from Mandrake : in the early years of Mandrake a jack +</I>>><i>     package already existed but it had nothing to do with JACK (Jack Audio +</I>>><i>     Connexion Kit) : it was a console frontend for cd rippers, still +</I>>><i>     provided in Mageia... +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i>     When JACK was imported into Mandrake it had to be given an other +</I>>><i> name... +</I>>><i>     so jackit !!! +</I>>><i>     There was a tonic controversy on Mandrake forum about this in 2003 or +</I>>><i>     2004 year. +</I>>><i>     Mandrake and then Mandriva and and then Mageia are the only +</I>>><i>     distributions calling JACK package "jackit" .... +</I>>><i>      > So I am questioning the naming of this existing package, and +</I>>><i>     would like +</I>>><i>      > to propose some rename along with a new name for a Jack1 package. +</I>>><i>      > Maybe simply "jack1" and "jack2"? Or "jack" and "jackdmp"? +</I>>><i>      > +</I>>><i>      > 2/ How should the virtual dependency be named? +</I>>><i>      > The existing "jackit" spec provides a "jackit-devel" and a +</I>>><i>     "libjack-devel". +</I>>><i>      > +</I>>><i>      > I think that none of the names are really fit IMO. First jackit +</I>>><i>     for the +</I>>><i>      > same reason as before (I don't see where this name comes from), +</I>>><i> also +</I>>><i>      > libjack (and the -devel suffix) because this kit is not *only* a +</I>>><i>     library +</I>>><i>      > (there are also the jackd daemon, tools, etc.). +</I>>><i>      > +</I>>><i>      > I propose simply "jack" as virtual package name. +</I>>><i>      > +</I>>><i>      > How does this sound? +</I>>><i>      > Thanks. +</I>>><i>      > +</I>>><i>      > Jehan +</I>>><i>     Not simple because of this context ... +</I>>><i>     If you want to call JACK jack you need to remove first the existing +</I>>><i> jack +</I>>><i>     from the repo, and to modify the spec for every package requiring +</I>>><i> jackit +</I>>><i>     now, to make them require jack if it is the new package name for JACK +</I>>><i> . +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i>     Post Scriptum : Reading this I don't know if my explanation  is clear +</I>>><i>     enough ... +</I>>><i>     A key to understand what I wrote : +</I>>><i>     "jack" is the name of a package (whatever its content is) +</I>>><i>     "jackit" is the name of a package +</I>>><i>     "JACK" is the recursive acronym (Jack Audio Connexion Kit) of the +</I>>><i>     software you are talking about +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> Ok I understood the deal. +</I>>><i> I would personally prefer even a longer package name like +</I>>><i> jack-audio-connection-kit. Mageia would gain from having clearer naming. +</I>>><i> Especially if we add the Jack1 alternative. +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> Now if this is a big deal, and it generates a controversy again, it is +</I>>><i> not that a big deal. The question thus is: how do I call Jack1 package +</I>>><i> then? And can I say that this new package "Provides: jackit" so that it +</I>>><i> works as an alternative to Jack2 (for instance for Ardour)? +</I>>><i> Thanks. +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> Jehan +</I>>><i> +</I>><i> +</I>><i> why not give jack1 the name : +</I>><i>  "jack1 - the Jack Audio Connection Kit 1" +</I>><i> and modify the description to include : +</I>><i>  "This is the original C implementation of the Jack Audio Connection Kit +</I>><i> protocol (JACK).  It is under active development concurrently with jackit +</I>><i> (JACK2)" +</I>><i> +</I>><i> +</I>I'll do this like this, then, and propose a SPEC to my mentor, maybe today. + +It might also be a good idea to modify the jackit description to indicate +><i> that it is concurrent to jack1 as well. +</I>><i> And maybe rename it to jack2, if it is not too complicated ? +</I>><i> +</I>><i> +</I>I guess the maintainer of this package will have to do this. I'll search +for his email. +Thanks all. + +Jehan + + +><i> We could always use provides to accommodate packages requiring JACK. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Just some suggestions ... +</I>><i> +</I>><i> -- +</I>><i> André +</I>><i> +</I>-------------- next part -------------- +An HTML attachment was scrubbed... +URL: </pipermail/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/35eded3e/attachment.html> +</PRE> + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> +    <HR> +    <P><UL> +        <!--threads--> +	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="019757.html">[Mageia-dev] Jack1 package missing +</A></li> +	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="019749.html">[Mageia-dev] Rebuilding drakx-installer-stage2 +</A></li> +         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>  +              <a href="date.html#19770">[ date ]</a> +              <a href="thread.html#19770">[ thread ]</a> +              <a href="subject.html#19770">[ subject ]</a> +              <a href="author.html#19770">[ author ]</a> +         </LI> +       </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html>  | 
