diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012550.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012550.html | 118 |
1 files changed, 118 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012550.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012550.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b49adf9d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012550.html @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] executable libraries + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20executable%20libraries&In-Reply-To=%3C4F521271.6010001%40gmail.com%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="012535.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="012899.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] executable libraries</H1> + <B>Guillaume Rousse</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20executable%20libraries&In-Reply-To=%3C4F521271.6010001%40gmail.com%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] executable libraries">guillomovitch at gmail.com + </A><BR> + <I>Sat Mar 3 13:45:37 CET 2012</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="012535.html">[Mageia-dev] executable libraries +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="012899.html">[Mageia-dev] executable libraries +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#12550">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#12550">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#12550">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#12550">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>Le 02/03/2012 22:01, Per Øyvind Karlsen a écrit : +><i> Den 21:51 2. mars 2012 skrev Maarten Vanraes<<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">alien at rmail.be</A>> følgende: +</I>>><i> Op vrijdag 02 maart 2012 21:29:05 schreef Anssi Hannula: +</I>>>><i> 02.03.2012 21:57, Maarten Vanraes kirjoitti: +</I>>>>><i> Op vrijdag 02 maart 2012 15:22:23 schreef Anssi Hannula: +</I>>>>>><i> 02.03.2012 00:17, Maarten Vanraes kirjoitti: +</I>>>>>>><i> Op donderdag 01 maart 2012 23:05:35 schreef Anssi Hannula: +</I>>>>>>><i> [...] +</I>>>>>>><i> +</I>>>>>>>>><i> does this mean debug info fails for these? +</I>>>>>>>><i> +</I>>>>>>>><i> I'm not immediately sure (I never remember how the debug/stripping +</I>>>>>>>><i> stuff works exactly), but I think either a) debug symbols extraction +</I>>>>>>>><i> and thus -debug packaging, b) stripping, or c) both will fail with +</I>>>>>>>><i> non-executable shared libs. +</I>>>>>>><i> +</I>>>>>>><i> in that case i guess we would need a policy or bs check to make sure we +</I>>>>>>><i> don't fail some libraries debug and strip +</I>>>>>><i> +</I>>>>>><i> Possibly. +</I>>>>>><i> +</I>>>>>><i> Interestingly, Debian policy disallows executable permission on shared +</I>>>>>><i> libs: +</I>>>>>><i> <A HREF="http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html#s-sharedlibs-">http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html#s-sharedlibs-</A> +</I>>>>>><i> ru ntime +</I>>>>>><i> +</I>>>>>><i> "Shared libraries should not be installed executable, since the dynamic +</I>>>>>><i> linker does not require this and trying to execute a shared library +</I>>>>>><i> usually results in a core dump." +</I>>>>><i> +</I>>>>><i> which is sort of strange, since libc is actually executable by design. +</I>>>>><i> +</I>>>>><i> i see where they are coming from +</I>>>>><i> +</I>>>>><i> but i guess the first part of this is, why is there a find with +</I>>>>><i> executable restrictions for the code relating to stripped binaries and +</I>>>>><i> debug? +</I>>>>><i> +</I>>>>><i> is it because it's also used for real executables? +</I>>>><i> +</I>>>><i> I guess it is there just to speed up the process, otherwise it would +</I>>>><i> have to run 'file' for every file in the package (and many packages have +</I>>>><i> lots of files). +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> still, it seems kind of weird, there are rpmlint checks for unstripped +</I>>><i> libraries, but i do have 34 libraries not marked as executable, while the +</I>>><i> stripping+ debug seems to target only executables? +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> i wonder if we should make another check library unset as executable or even +</I>>><i> check what happened with these libraries not marked as executable? +</I>><i> I posted a link to a rpmlint patch implementing such a check to this thread two +</I>><i> hours ago.. :p +</I>I don't much point to a check, when a rpm-helper scriptlet would be able +to automatically enforce any given permission set. + +-- +Mines are equal opportunity weapons + -- Murphy's Military Laws n°55 +</PRE> + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="012535.html">[Mageia-dev] executable libraries +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="012899.html">[Mageia-dev] executable libraries +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#12550">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#12550">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#12550">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#12550">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |