diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016562.html')
-rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016562.html | 151 |
1 files changed, 151 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016562.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016562.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7e2643b7e --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016562.html @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Proposed Feature:Backports_update_applet + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Proposed%20Feature%3ABackports_update_applet&In-Reply-To=%3Co9gua9-rc4.ln1%40psd.motzarella.org%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016516.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="016431.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] Proposed Feature:Backports_update_applet</H1> + <B>blind Pete</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Proposed%20Feature%3ABackports_update_applet&In-Reply-To=%3Co9gua9-rc4.ln1%40psd.motzarella.org%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Proposed Feature:Backports_update_applet">0123peter at gmail.com + </A><BR> + <I>Sat Jun 16 16:03:04 CEST 2012</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016516.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposed Feature:Backports_update_applet +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="016431.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposed Feature:Backports_update_applet +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#16562">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#16562">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#16562">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#16562">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>andre999 wrote: + +><i> blind Pete a écrit : +</I>>><i> andre999 wrote: +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> +</I>>>><i> blind Pete a écrit : +</I>>>><i> +</I>>>>><i> andre999 wrote: +</I>>>>><i> +</I>>>>><i> +</I>>>>><i> +</I>>>>>><i> blind Pete a écrit : +</I>>>>>><i> +</I>>>>>><i> +</I>>>>>>><i> Samuel Verschelde wrote: +</I>>>>>>><i> +</I>>>>>>><i> +</I>>>>>>><i> +</I>>>>>>><i> +</I>>>><i> +</I>>><i> [snip] +</I>>><i> +</I>>>>>><i> - Functioning as an update, it would only replace already installed +</I>>>>>><i> backports, once the tools are appropriately adjusted. +</I>>>>>><i> +</I>>>>>><i> +</I>>>>><i> There are a couple of ways to do that. The simplest that I can think +</I>>>>><i> of is to split "backports" into "backports" and "backports update". +</I>>>>><i> Allow cherry picking from "backports" and apply "backports update" +</I>>>>><i> automatically. +</I>>>>><i> +</I>>>>><i> +</I>>>><i> I was thinking of cases where the user chooses to "update" their +</I>>>><i> system. New versions of backports already installed would be presented +</I>>>><i> as updates, along with those from the update repos. +</I>>>><i> Just as we don't have any update-update repos, it wouldn't make sense to +</I>>>><i> have backport-update repos either. +</I>>>><i> +</I>>><i> [snip] +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> It depends on how you look at it. +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> If you consider non-free, tainted, and backport to be optional +</I>>><i> and any update package to be highly recommended if and only if +</I>>><i> the corresponding package is already installed. Then is does +</I>>><i> not matter if the old package is a tainted.rpm, nonfree.rpm, +</I>>><i> bp.rpm, or an ordinary rpm. Just one way to look at it, not +</I>>><i> the only way. +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> +</I>><i> But how is it possible to distinguish a priori between a backport which +</I>><i> will be an update and one which will be a "new" backport on a users' +</I>><i> system. It would only be an "update" if the user has already installed +</I>><i> the corresponding backport on their system. +</I> +If the rpm is tagged, either internally or just by having "bp" in +the file name you can tell if it is a backport. If a new package +has the same name - including the "bp" part - but a higher version +number, install it, else, just list it as available. Or they could +be kept in different places. + +><i> If the fact it is a backport is ignored, then every backport would be, +</I>><i> by definition, an update. Even packages newly imported to Mageia. +</I> +??? + +I meant that the logic for dealing with a bp-update would be the +same as for nonfree-update and tainted-update (and I suspect, +update itself). Re-use existing code. + +><i> To me, a "corresponding" package is one from the same category, +</I>><i> according to whether is is backport or not, and according to whether in +</I>><i> "core", "nonfree", or "tainted". +</I>><i> To consider otherwise is to deny the importance of these categories. +</I> +Catagories multiply here, not add, you have listed six, not four. + +><i> Backports are considered separately because they are much more at risk +</I>><i> to not function properly, since they weren't tested with the rest of the +</I>><i> release, being added afterwards. So we have to be much more careful +</I>><i> about adding them. The last thing we want is for the backports to be +</I>><i> included automatically with updates, even if the user had not already +</I>><i> decided to install the corresponding backport. Installing a backport +</I>><i> should be an exceptional, explicitly decided activity -- except when the +</I>><i> user has already decided to install the corresponding backport, when it +</I>><i> is useful to present newer versions as updates. They are likely +</I>><i> security or bug fixes. +</I> +I think that we are in agreement. + + +</PRE> + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016516.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposed Feature:Backports_update_applet +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="016431.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposed Feature:Backports_update_applet +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#16562">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#16562">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#16562">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#16562">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |