diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016268.html')
-rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016268.html | 144 |
1 files changed, 144 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016268.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016268.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4b0ee2789 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016268.html @@ -0,0 +1,144 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion) + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20policy%20clarification%20%28and%20discussion%29&In-Reply-To=%3C201206081051.52086.stormi%40laposte.net%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016267.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="016271.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)</H1> + <B>Samuel Verschelde</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Backports%20policy%20clarification%20%28and%20discussion%29&In-Reply-To=%3C201206081051.52086.stormi%40laposte.net%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion)">stormi at laposte.net + </A><BR> + <I>Fri Jun 8 10:51:52 CEST 2012</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016267.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion) +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="016271.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion) +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#16268">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#16268">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#16268">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#16268">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>Le vendredi 8 juin 2012 10:49:42, Sander Lepik a écrit : +><i> 08.06.2012 11:38, Samuel Verschelde kirjutas: +</I>><i> > I re-read the backports policy, and there's a part I think needs to be +</I>><i> > pointed out before people start to backport packages. +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > "We need to ensure that upgrades never fail: cauldron must always have a +</I>><i> > higher version/release than in stable releases." +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > This statement is true, but implies more than what it says. It means that +</I>><i> > we can't backport a package for Mageia 1 with a higher version than what +</I>><i> > we have in Mageia 2 release (and updates?) media. And this, until we are +</I>><i> > able to take backports into account during upgrades. +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > Example : +</I>><i> > - Mageia 2 has wesnoth 1.10.2 in core/release +</I>><i> > - Mageia 1 can't get a higher version in its backports media +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > Do you all agree with my understanding of the policy ? +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > This is a serious limitation to our ability to backport to Mageia (n-1) +</I>><i> > and even to our ability to provide security fixes to backports there +</I>><i> > (will not prevent it, but will prevent to do it by a version upgrade, +</I>><i> > which is the common way to fix that kind of issue in backports). +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > Maybe we shouldn't open backports for Mageia 1, and make sure upgrade to +</I>><i> > Mageia 3 can take backports from Mageia 2 into account so that backports +</I>><i> > to Mageia 2 are not stopped when Mageia 3 is released. Then we'll be +</I>><i> > safe. +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > Samuel +</I>><i> +</I>><i> I think backports should be open until new stable is released. So we should +</I>><i> not open backports for mga1 and when mga2 is released then backports for +</I>><i> mga2 will be closed. It's the only way we can manage upgrades with our +</I>><i> current packager resources. +</I>><i> +</I> +And what about security issues and bugs to those backports? It will use more +packager ressource to patch backports than to provide newer versions, won't +it? +</PRE> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016267.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion) +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="016271.html">[Mageia-dev] Backports policy clarification (and discussion) +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#16268">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#16268">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#16268">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#16268">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |