diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006797.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006797.html | 147 |
1 files changed, 147 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006797.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006797.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5afe97005 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006797.html @@ -0,0 +1,147 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] kernel 3.0 is a big mistake in cauldron + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20kernel%203.0%20is%20a%20big%20mistake%20in%20cauldron&In-Reply-To=%3C1310852012.98772.YahooMailNeo%40web161710.mail.bf1.yahoo.com%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="006795.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="006801.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] kernel 3.0 is a big mistake in cauldron</H1> + <B>Radu-Cristian FOTESCU</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20kernel%203.0%20is%20a%20big%20mistake%20in%20cauldron&In-Reply-To=%3C1310852012.98772.YahooMailNeo%40web161710.mail.bf1.yahoo.com%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] kernel 3.0 is a big mistake in cauldron">beranger5ca at yahoo.ca + </A><BR> + <I>Sat Jul 16 23:33:32 CEST 2011</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006795.html">[Mageia-dev] kernel 3.0 is a big mistake in cauldron +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="006801.html">[Mageia-dev] kernel 3.0 is a big mistake in cauldron +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#6797">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#6797">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#6797">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#6797">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE> + +><i> The above statement clearly says "I've only read one feature of +</I>><i> systemd" +</I> +Maybe it's not about systemd. Maybe it's about upstart. Or maybe +it's about a half-dozen init system I don't care about -- and you know +why? + +Not just because I'm not a sysadmin, but because the public image -- +those 99% of the enthusiastic blog posts and reviews and whatever +the Linux fanbois are doing -- only stress on boot time charts, and +"hey, this one boots 1 second faster!" + +The bling-bling & glitter is not my fault. This is how Linux is marketed +-- and not only by Ubuntu/Canonical. + +Still, restarting the network w/o losing any connection (I can't figure +out how this is possible) should not belong IMVHO to the init system. +It could as well be a specific change only related to networking. +There must be more than one way to do a thing. + +><i> I can't say I'm surprised that you're jumping to conclusions again +</I>><i> and +</I>><i> making up your own reason and justifications as this is exactly how +</I>><i> you've behaved on this list thus far. +</I> +This doesn't change the fact that in Linux, as soon as a technology is +mature & stable enough, someone gets on steroids and decides to +develop a totally different replacement, which is then pushed on the +market while not entirely production-ready. + +Of course, RHEL won't get it until it's production ready (except that it +got KDE4 with plenty of bugs), but by "market" I wasn't only referring +to the commercial offerings. Market is also people trying to escape +the Microsoft tax. + +I am using Linux because it's funny, but XP SP3 is far more stable +to me, so I always keep a working partition with it. 2 BSODs in 2 years +(and it's constantly updated), at pair with 2 kernel panics in 2 years +(for stable distros!), but hundreds and hundreds of KDE or apps crashes. + +I'm not jumping to any conclusion, I'm just not a fan of anything. It's hard +to find someone working in IT that is not proud of the field -- you too are +proud. I am working in IT and I don't praise anything. I'm sick of the lack +of quality in the software field, that's all, and planned or perceived +obsolescence is one of the causes, unnecessary complexity is another +one, and there are many more -- mostly cultural and a sign of our ages. +(Maybe I'm too old and, as an electrical engineer, I remember the times +when everything that worked was hardware and wired logic at most.) + +R-C +</PRE> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006795.html">[Mageia-dev] kernel 3.0 is a big mistake in cauldron +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="006801.html">[Mageia-dev] kernel 3.0 is a big mistake in cauldron +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#6797">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#6797">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#6797">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#6797">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |