diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006761.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006761.html | 155 | 
1 files changed, 155 insertions, 0 deletions
| diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006761.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006761.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f334504d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006761.html @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> +   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] kernel 3.0 is a big mistake in cauldron +   </TITLE> +   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > +   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20kernel%203.0%20is%20a%20big%20mistake%20in%20cauldron&In-Reply-To=%3C201107161503.48071.anaselli%40linux.it%3E"> +   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> +   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> +   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="006760.html"> +   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="006765.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> +   <H1>[Mageia-dev] kernel 3.0 is a big mistake in cauldron</H1> +    <B>Angelo Naselli</B>  +    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20kernel%203.0%20is%20a%20big%20mistake%20in%20cauldron&In-Reply-To=%3C201107161503.48071.anaselli%40linux.it%3E" +       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] kernel 3.0 is a big mistake in cauldron">anaselli at linux.it +       </A><BR> +    <I>Sat Jul 16 15:03:47 CEST 2011</I> +    <P><UL> +        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006760.html">[Mageia-dev] kernel 3.0 is a big mistake in cauldron +</A></li> +        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="006765.html">[Mageia-dev] kernel 3.0 is a big mistake in cauldron +</A></li> +         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>  +              <a href="date.html#6761">[ date ]</a> +              <a href="thread.html#6761">[ thread ]</a> +              <a href="subject.html#6761">[ subject ]</a> +              <a href="author.html#6761">[ author ]</a> +         </LI> +       </UL> +    <HR>   +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>><i> "THE ONE AND ONLY THING properly designed in Windows is that you can use +</I>><i> (almost) ANY version of ANY application w/o breaking the system and w/o +</I>><i> upgrading the system!" +</I>*Almost* as you said. Also windows changed and sometimes changes +between a sp to another, sometimes (often) some applications +just stop working. +And yes you can take the old one. But it's not always easy. +It depends on the good will of developers, not all the not open source +projects leave old packages to download... +And yes, you've probably been right,  it's *very* *easy* to downgrade a  +W. service pack... + +><i> In all the Linux distros, once the official repos have upgraded an +</I>><i> application, you're normally supposed to use it, because downgrading is: +</I>><i> (1) difficult; +</I>For those who do not want to learn yes. For those who are just users yes. +The first kind cannot complain, the second one yes. But some distros +add some package that allows to install new programs locally +(one of those was called autopackage, now forked... i tested once,  +worked but *I* did not need such a feature). +><i> (2) discouraged. +</I>Why? locally you can always do what you want. I remember a friend that +installed a RH, but after that he installed all the programs he needs +by using configure make make install... it was not a red hat anymore +but it started like it was. He had what he needed and worked how he liked to. + +><i> Because, postulate 2, "whereas different versions of system DLLs can +</I>><i> coexist in a given Windows release, this is typically impossible in Linux, +</I>><i> BY DESIGN" (and this is not about GTK+1 coexisting with GTK+2, nor about +</I>><i> KDE3 compatibility libs in KDE4, and also not about installing in /opt or +</I>><i> other tricks). +</I>different dlls can lay on the system only if the are different. e.g name version +etc, the same it's for .so files. So the problem is not on the system but on +the developers, if they break abi and don't change the so version according +and the packager does not see that, then yes  they can't co-exists. +  +><i> Breaking a package is one thing, breaking the kernel is a totally different +</I>><i> one. +</I>Why don't you ask that to those people that run to buy windows vista after +an update of a famous anti-virus in XP, because they cannot use their system  +any more? +  + + +--  +	Angelo +-------------- next part -------------- +A non-text attachment was scrubbed... +Name: not available +Type: application/pgp-signature +Size: 198 bytes +Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. +URL: </pipermail/mageia-dev/attachments/20110716/8d003769/attachment.asc> +</PRE> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> +    <HR> +    <P><UL> +        <!--threads--> +	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006760.html">[Mageia-dev] kernel 3.0 is a big mistake in cauldron +</A></li> +	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="006765.html">[Mageia-dev] kernel 3.0 is a big mistake in cauldron +</A></li> +         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>  +              <a href="date.html#6761">[ date ]</a> +              <a href="thread.html#6761">[ thread ]</a> +              <a href="subject.html#6761">[ subject ]</a> +              <a href="author.html#6761">[ author ]</a> +         </LI> +       </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> | 
