summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006457.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006457.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006457.html116
1 files changed, 116 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006457.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006457.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a6616a644
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006457.html
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Repository%20question%3A%20where%20do%20we%20put%0A%20non-free%2Btainted%20RPMs%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4E163EAA.3000007%40laposte.net%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="006438.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="006462.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?</H1>
+ <B>andre999</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Repository%20question%3A%20where%20do%20we%20put%0A%20non-free%2Btainted%20RPMs%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4E163EAA.3000007%40laposte.net%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?">andr55 at laposte.net
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Fri Jul 8 01:18:02 CEST 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006438.html">[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="006462.html">[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#6457">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#6457">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#6457">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#6457">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Wolfgang Bornath a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i> 2011/7/7 nicolas vigier&lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">boklm at mars-attacks.org</A>&gt;:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> On Thu, 07 Jul 2011, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> I must admit I do not understand the cause of this discussion, maybe I
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> am thinking in too simple ways. Free goes in core, non-free goes in
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> non-free. If a non-free software has a restrictive license it goes in
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> tainted. A free software can not have a restrictive license, if it has
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> it is not free and goes in tainted.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Tainted is not about restrictive license but patents. A free software
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> can have a free license, but do something which is maybe patented.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Yes, right. I made a mistake there - just replace &quot;restrictive
+</I>&gt;<i> license&quot; with &quot;patents&quot; in my sentence.
+</I>
+&quot;free&quot; means that it can be redistributed with source code, with a free/open
+source license.
+&quot;non-free&quot; (in terms of the repos) means that it can be redistributed, but
+either not with source code, according to the license + or we simply don't
+have/can't get the source code.
+&quot;tainted&quot; was mostly for packages affected to some extent by tainted patents.
+Such packages could be free or non-free, that has nothing to do with being in
+&quot;tainted&quot;.
+Some discussions in the past considered that the likelihood of a patent
+impacting a particular software (in the few countries that do accept software
+packages to some extent, like the USA), should affect whether it goes into
+tainted or not. I don't know what consensus there was on this point, if any.
+
+There were some suggestions that non-free packages should go into &quot;non-free&quot;,
+even if considered subject to tainted patents. And some proposed excluding
+such packages.
+
+So the question is, should a non-free package potentially affected by patents
+go into &quot;non-free&quot; or &quot;tainted&quot;.
+Those more interested in using &quot;free&quot; as much as possible, might tend to say
+&quot;non-free&quot;, especially if they use &quot;tainted&quot;. So as to avoid using any
+non-free packages.
+Those who consider patents legitimate, among others, might tend to say
+&quot;tainted&quot;, especially if they use &quot;non-free. So as to avoid using any software
+which might be subject to patents. If they live in an area where software
+patents risk to be found legitimate, such as the USA.
+Of course, those who don't use &quot;non-free&quot; (except for software coming from it's
+manufacturer) or &quot;tainted&quot;, wouldn't be concerned by this question.
+
+--
+Andr&#233;
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006438.html">[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="006462.html">[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#6457">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#6457">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#6457">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#6457">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>