summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101018/001260.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101018/001260.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101018/001260.html114
1 files changed, 114 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101018/001260.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101018/001260.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..5270e8a08
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101018/001260.html
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3Ci9geo5%24uj4%241%40dough.gmane.org%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001279.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001264.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?</H1>
+ <B>Marc Par&#233;</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3Ci9geo5%24uj4%241%40dough.gmane.org%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?">marc at marcpare.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Mon Oct 18 05:25:57 CEST 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001279.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001264.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1260">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1260">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1260">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1260">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Le 2010-10-17 19:44, Michael Scherer a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i> Le vendredi 15 octobre 2010 &#224; 22:00 -0500, Fernando Parra a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I am just coming back from my weekend, so I may have missed lots of
+</I>&gt;<i> discussion, but there is 2 points in your mail that I really wanted to
+</I>&gt;<i> address.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> The basic/novice user doesn't read anything, doesn't request anything
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> to some like a bugzilla,
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> And so, because some users are considered too lazy, we should do the
+</I>&gt;<i> work for them ?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I am living in a world where days are only 24h long. If people are not
+</I>&gt;<i> able to do their part of the work like &quot;filling a proper bug report on
+</I>&gt;<i> bugzilla to get their wish done for free by a already overworked
+</I>&gt;<i> volunteer&quot;, the only answer I can give is 'too bad for them'.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> If packagers were not already busy, yeah, I would think we should have
+</I>&gt;<i> more backports requests. But if there is any packager that think &quot;I do
+</I>&gt;<i> not have enough work, give me more&quot;, he can send me a mail and I will
+</I>&gt;<i> have no problem to help him solve this issue fo too much free time.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> While I agree we should lower the bar for all kind of contributions, I
+</I>&gt;<i> am not sure that giving more work to packagers by requesting backports
+</I>&gt;<i> clearly qualify as a contribution, and so as such should not be lowered
+</I>&gt;<i> too easily.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> So before doing anything, we need to think about scaling from our side.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Please take in mind that we are trying to get a considerable number of new users.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I do not think I am ok to be counted in the &quot;we&quot; you use. I do not think
+</I>&gt;<i> I want, nor that I will even try to get a considerable number of new
+</I>&gt;<i> users, I want a sustainable number of users that can be properly taught
+</I>&gt;<i> of free software way and ecosystem, so they can be later part of the
+</I>&gt;<i> community as people who help us in very direct way. And that's what I
+</I>&gt;<i> will try to do.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+Thanks Michael for the note. This is why I am in favour of streamlining
+the reporting of bugs from the user side and not the dev. Devs should
+always count on seeing bugs reported on bugzilla and nothing more.
+However, on the user side, to keep the reporting of bug flow from
+breaking down, I suggest a two tier format that I discussed earlier.
+Maybe have a look at this and comment?
+
+I imagine that the Mageia devs are interested in hearing of bugs from as
+many sources as possible regardless of user experience.
+
+Marc Pare
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001279.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001264.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1260">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1260">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1260">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1260">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>