summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101014/001192.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101014/001192.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101014/001192.html113
1 files changed, 113 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101014/001192.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101014/001192.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c04b43fd3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101014/001192.html
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C20101014151400.GA21938%40mars-attacks.org%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001189.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001193.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?</H1>
+ <B>nicolas vigier</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C20101014151400.GA21938%40mars-attacks.org%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?">boklm at mars-attacks.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Thu Oct 14 17:14:00 CEST 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001189.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001193.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1192">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1192">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1192">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1192">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, Tux99 wrote:
+
+&gt;<i> On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, nicolas vigier wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, Tux99 wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; I think they should be enabled by default, since it's my impression that
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; the majority of 'normal' users wants new versions of apps, those users who
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; DON'T want them can still always disable them.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; If backports repository is enabled by default, it should be stable. How
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; do you garantee that backports will never break ?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Nicolas, please re-read old posts of this thread we discussed this
+</I>&gt;<i> already, the conclusion was that there are no guarantees in
+</I>&gt;<i> life. Experience tells us backports don't normally break any more than
+</I>&gt;<i> the regular security/bugfix updates.
+</I>
+Experience tells me that backports break much more than regular
+security/bugfix updates.
+
+&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; Backports shouldn't be second choice, it should be the default, since that
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; would make Mageia stand out from other distros as being the distro were
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; users get the latest versions of apps before any other major distro
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; provides them.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Just providing the latest version of apps is not enough to &quot;stand out
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; from other distros&quot;.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I didn't say this should be the ONLY unique feature of Mageia.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; All distros could do it, and they usually already do it in their
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; developement version. But the problem is always the same:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; adding new versions create instability.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> All distros COULD do it but they don't, the dev version doesn't count
+</I>&gt;<i> as that is obviously much more unstable, since it's meant for
+</I>&gt;<i> experimenting.
+</I>
+They could do it, but they don't do it in the stable branch. Maybe there
+is a reason ?
+
+&gt;<i> Providing new versions usually gives MORE stability since newer version
+</I>&gt;<i> normally include loads of bug fixes too, but again we debated this
+</I>&gt;<i> already, see old posts in this thread.
+</I>
+The software itself can be more stable, but not the integration with
+the other software.
+
+This was debated already, but you're still not answering the question
+about how you can guarantee that it will be stable enough (the
+integration between all the software, not only the software themself).
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001189.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001193.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1192">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1192">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1192">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1192">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>