summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101013/001150.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101013/001150.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101013/001150.html184
1 files changed, 184 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101013/001150.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101013/001150.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8888e05dc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101013/001150.html
@@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Mageia repository sections, licenses, restrictions, firmware etc
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mageia%20repository%20sections%2C%20licenses%2C%20restrictions%2C%0A%20firmware%20etc&In-Reply-To=%3C1286994121.18205.84.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001156.html">
+
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Mageia repository sections, licenses, restrictions, firmware etc</H1>
+ <B>Michael Scherer</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mageia%20repository%20sections%2C%20licenses%2C%20restrictions%2C%0A%20firmware%20etc&In-Reply-To=%3C1286994121.18205.84.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Mageia repository sections, licenses, restrictions, firmware etc">misc at zarb.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Wed Oct 13 20:22:01 CEST 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001156.html">[Mageia-dev] Mageia repository sections, licenses, restrictions, firmware etc
+</A></li>
+
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1150">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1150">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1150">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1150">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Le mardi 12 octobre 2010 &#224; 18:02 +0300, Anssi Hannula a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i> Hi all!
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Do people have any thoughts on what kind of repository/media sectioning we
+</I>&gt;<i> should use on Mageia, and what should those sections contain?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Note that I won't talk about backports / private repositories in this post,
+</I>&gt;<i> only about the basic sectioning and packages in those.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Some points to consider (I've written my opinion in ones where I have one):
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> == Do we want a separated core repository?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> No separated core: Fedora, Debian, Opensuse
+</I>&gt;<i> Separated core: Mandriva (main), Ubuntu (main), Arch (Core)
+</I>
+How do we decide what would be in core ?
+
+
+&gt;<i> == How are the sections named? :)
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I think I'm in favor of renaming 'contrib' to 'extra'.
+</I>
++1, if we decide to keep contrib
+
+
+&gt;<i> == Where do firmware without license go (DVB, V4L, etc)?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> To unsupported non-free repository: Ubuntu (multiverse) [1],
+</I>&gt;<i> To unsupported repository without binary packages: Arch (AUR)
+</I>&gt;<i> Nowhere: Debian, Fedora, Opensuse, Mandriva
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I guess for this one I'd prefer a helper draktool to handle/download these
+</I>&gt;<i> instead of shipping them ourselves.
+</I>
+If there is no licence, I would say &quot;Nowhere&quot;. This is just illegal
+under most country laws, despites likely to be uneforced by
+rightholders. So, even if I think the legal risk is low, I would say
+&quot;no&quot; because this is a question of free software ethics more than laws.
+
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> == What about patents?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Almost no software with patents: Fedora, Opensuse
+</I>&gt;<i> - Essentially no media codecs except theora/vorbis/ogg/vp8 etc.
+</I>&gt;<i> - Strange exception: libXft, Cairo and Qt4 are shipped with LCD filtering
+</I>&gt;<i> support enabled, even if it is disabled in freetype
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> No software with enforced patents: Debian
+</I>&gt;<i> - not included (at least): x264 (encoder), lame mp3 (encoder)
+</I>&gt;<i> - included (at least): MPEG/x decoders, H.264 decoders, MP3 decoders,
+</I>&gt;<i> AAC decoders, AMR decoders, DTS decoders, AC3 decoders,
+</I>&gt;<i> WMV/WMA decoders, realvideo decoders, etc
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Some software covered by patents not included: Mandriva
+</I>&gt;<i> - see below for more information
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> All software covered by patents allowed: Arch, Ubuntu
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> IMO we should alter our policy to match either Fedora, Debian or Ubuntu.. The
+</I>&gt;<i> Mandriva policy makes no sense (for example, no AAC decoder but yes for H.264
+</I>&gt;<i> decoder and MPEG-4 encoder?).
+</I>&gt;<i> I'm really not sure which way we should go, though. WDYT?
+</I>
+I would go the Debian way.
+Ubuntu and Fedora are tied to companies, and Debian is not, so their
+policies are likely more adapted to our own model.
+
+Debian way seems to be more pragmatic that Ubuntu/Fedora on that matter.
+
+&gt;<i> == Do we allow P2P file transfer software?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Yes: Arch, Debian, Fedora, Ubuntu
+</I>&gt;<i> No, except torrents: Mandriva
+</I>&gt;<i> Unknown, at least torrents allowed: Opensuse
+</I>
+I would say &quot;yes&quot;. The reason of the rule in Mandriva was unclear and
+not justified, IMHO.
+
+Afaik, it was just &quot;there is lots of lawsuits going on this, let's
+forbid it&quot;. Maybe if someone can get in touch with Lenny, he can explain
+us, but I think this was not baked by anything.
+
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> == And gaming emulators?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Allowed: Arch, Debian, Ubuntu
+</I>&gt;<i> Mostly no, but at least fuse-emulator is shipped: Fedora
+</I>&gt;<i> Unknown, but lots of them are in OBS 'Emulators' project (unofficial but in
+</I>&gt;<i> official mirrors): Opensuse
+</I>&gt;<i> No, but at least zsnes is shipped: Mandriva
+</I>
+Well, why separate gamin emulator from regular emulator ?
+
+The legal risk is near zero in both case, given the few cases since 10
+years. Sony lost the lawsuit against Bleem
+( <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleem!">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleem!</A> ), and again Connectix
+( <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Game_Station">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Game_Station</A> ).
+
+The only recent case I can think of is when Nintendo asked to Youtube
+and Apple to remove a application that looked like a DS. Given the speed
+of Apple and Youtube to remove contents and software, we cannot consider
+this as a legal basis for anything.
+
+
+&gt;<i>From what I have seen, emulators are much likely to be dropped because
+</I>they are unmaintained than others reasons.
+
+And Fedora rational about this
+( <A HREF="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Emulators">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Emulators</A> ) is IMHO
+weak. I know people who play to the game they bought on their console, I
+know people who play to game they developed, and we even have people who
+ported linux ( like dslinux, but the site seems down ).
+
+So I would align on Debian policy ( and as the zsnes maintainer, I have
+no idea of why it was allowed in contrib while the others one didn't ).
+
+--
+Michael Scherer
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001156.html">[Mageia-dev] Mageia repository sections, licenses, restrictions, firmware etc
+</A></li>
+
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1150">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1150">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1150">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1150">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>