diff options
| author | Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org> | 2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org> | 2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000 |
| commit | 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch) | |
| tree | b175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900 | |
| parent | fa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff) | |
| download | archives-master.tar archives-master.tar.gz archives-master.tar.bz2 archives-master.tar.xz archives-master.zip | |
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment-0001.html | 45 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment.html | 45 |
2 files changed, 90 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a2cde751c --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> +<html> + <head> + <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" + http-equiv="Content-Type"> + <title></title> + </head> + <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff"> + Le 07/06/2011 10:00, Olav Vitters a écrit : + <blockquote cite="mid:20110607080033.GA5019@bkor.dhs.org" + type="cite"> + <pre wrap="">On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:48:55AM +0200, Thomas Lottmann wrote: +</pre> + <blockquote type="cite"> + <pre wrap="">On the other hand, I'd like to still have the possibility to keep +and install Gnome 2.xx in the future, as Gnome 3 isn't both stable +and reliable and complete yet. +</pre> + </blockquote> + <pre wrap=""> +GNOME 2.x is not needed, there is the fallback mode in GNOME3; it'll +give you a gnome-panel and so on. The default layout looks like +GNOME-shell, but it just is a newer gnome-panel. + +Regarding GNOME 3 not being reliable, can you reference some bugreports? +This as I don't see any huge problems, especially not for a .0 release. +</pre> + </blockquote> + <font face="Liberation Sans"><br> + The falback mode still relies qui a lot on Gnome 3. I concede I + need to do some more testing on a longer period of time, but on + the two computer using a SuSE based system running Gnome 3, I had + quite a lot numerous visual issues and got one program crashing. + But some time has passed and there were probably updates so I need + to retest. <br> + <br> + But looking at the available environments, I'm thinking that in + case some people really can't handle Gnome 3, there is actually + Xfce that can be a good fallback. I'm not sure there are enough + people for maintaining Gnome 2.32 for six extra months. I am + simply cautions about releases that may not be really polished and + stable. <br> + </font> + </body> +</html> diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a2cde751c --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment.html @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> +<html> + <head> + <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" + http-equiv="Content-Type"> + <title></title> + </head> + <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff"> + Le 07/06/2011 10:00, Olav Vitters a écrit : + <blockquote cite="mid:20110607080033.GA5019@bkor.dhs.org" + type="cite"> + <pre wrap="">On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:48:55AM +0200, Thomas Lottmann wrote: +</pre> + <blockquote type="cite"> + <pre wrap="">On the other hand, I'd like to still have the possibility to keep +and install Gnome 2.xx in the future, as Gnome 3 isn't both stable +and reliable and complete yet. +</pre> + </blockquote> + <pre wrap=""> +GNOME 2.x is not needed, there is the fallback mode in GNOME3; it'll +give you a gnome-panel and so on. The default layout looks like +GNOME-shell, but it just is a newer gnome-panel. + +Regarding GNOME 3 not being reliable, can you reference some bugreports? +This as I don't see any huge problems, especially not for a .0 release. +</pre> + </blockquote> + <font face="Liberation Sans"><br> + The falback mode still relies qui a lot on Gnome 3. I concede I + need to do some more testing on a longer period of time, but on + the two computer using a SuSE based system running Gnome 3, I had + quite a lot numerous visual issues and got one program crashing. + But some time has passed and there were probably updates so I need + to retest. <br> + <br> + But looking at the available environments, I'm thinking that in + case some people really can't handle Gnome 3, there is actually + Xfce that can be a good fallback. I'm not sure there are enough + people for maintaining Gnome 2.32 for six extra months. I am + simply cautions about releases that may not be really polished and + stable. <br> + </font> + </body> +</html> |