From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- .../20110607/00ffb900/attachment-0001.html | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment.html | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment-0001.html create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a2cde751c --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ + + + + + + + + Le 07/06/2011 10:00, Olav Vitters a écrit : +
+ 
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:48:55AM +0200, Thomas Lottmann wrote:
+
+
+ 
On the other hand, I'd like to still have the possibility to keep
+and install Gnome 2.xx in the future, as Gnome 3 isn't both stable
+and reliable and complete yet.
+
+
+ 
+GNOME 2.x is not needed, there is the fallback mode in GNOME3; it'll
+give you a gnome-panel and so on. The default layout looks like
+GNOME-shell, but it just is a newer gnome-panel.
+
+Regarding GNOME 3 not being reliable, can you reference some bugreports?
+This as I don't see any huge problems, especially not for a .0 release.
+
+
+
+ The falback mode still relies qui a lot on Gnome 3. I concede I + need to do some more testing on a longer period of time, but on + the two computer using a SuSE based system running Gnome 3, I had + quite a lot numerous visual issues and got one program crashing. + But some time has passed and there were probably updates so I need + to retest.
+
+ But looking at the available environments, I'm thinking that in + case some people really can't handle Gnome 3, there is actually + Xfce that can be a good fallback. I'm not sure there are enough + people for maintaining Gnome 2.32 for six extra months. I am + simply cautions about releases that may not be really polished and + stable.
+ + + diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a2cde751c --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment.html @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ + + + + + + + + Le 07/06/2011 10:00, Olav Vitters a écrit : +
+ 
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:48:55AM +0200, Thomas Lottmann wrote:
+
+
+ 
On the other hand, I'd like to still have the possibility to keep
+and install Gnome 2.xx in the future, as Gnome 3 isn't both stable
+and reliable and complete yet.
+
+
+ 
+GNOME 2.x is not needed, there is the fallback mode in GNOME3; it'll
+give you a gnome-panel and so on. The default layout looks like
+GNOME-shell, but it just is a newer gnome-panel.
+
+Regarding GNOME 3 not being reliable, can you reference some bugreports?
+This as I don't see any huge problems, especially not for a .0 release.
+
+
+
+ The falback mode still relies qui a lot on Gnome 3. I concede I + need to do some more testing on a longer period of time, but on + the two computer using a SuSE based system running Gnome 3, I had + quite a lot numerous visual issues and got one program crashing. + But some time has passed and there were probably updates so I need + to retest.
+
+ But looking at the available environments, I'm thinking that in + case some people really can't handle Gnome 3, there is actually + Xfce that can be a good fallback. I'm not sure there are enough + people for maintaining Gnome 2.32 for six extra months. I am + simply cautions about releases that may not be really polished and + stable.
+ + + -- cgit v1.2.1