diff options
author | Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org> | 2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org> | 2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000 |
commit | 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch) | |
tree | b175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420 | |
parent | fa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff) | |
download | archives-master.tar archives-master.tar.gz archives-master.tar.bz2 archives-master.tar.xz archives-master.zip |
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420')
8 files changed, 272 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/05314074/attachment-0001.asc b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/05314074/attachment-0001.asc new file mode 100644 index 000000000..61d1d5fc7 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/05314074/attachment-0001.asc @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- +Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) + +iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPkcJgAAoJEOsuQJrxVIpnNA8P/1AY9HcpFZQ0l7bNXzFjABtP +qxeurAL5JfRi1276KEZpYaEHLjlnqnHAfXwGV8XQD1+nSdigqjjtZXTHC97vKkNI +0ESU/lai+OABDrdvGPVAHLuDPOXM+tyMT+M/YLaet67izQEc53XQ17xg4agadslU +RVQfc4/zrJq3UzW1UGEQ1AwdIGmORkgzcBq0M5pZ2n9d3UQEH3TkHjPwW1LucDC2 +KpdUAEUUohqoItPfpVnVfSM4k+5ZEFjFp1bpyMOztf2aopREo3DemYFrQu6olUyP +udJVZDdDKP73cGrgTleOrZelbMaBcX9DSUasc2dD6sF5xjxzbuhhZsLp941orrL4 +Hh6MmUfnqpzBiDi84os9ac+O+79fexC13gcT3coTv6TIVzmjqNj0p5j9kC8Y/yly +dvRRH3Z8GneLMJ54QHhC1/Axu55KRi2Lu1Fae6P84WmIdX0eUxVmiR/2kGRyZcnU +m1h9h08EwKYe9JAqEoCWygPSUjnIOIZzlk7AoRRHx0biLtu9EBonVAIUikGxI9mx +BtwNnBrJWYUOR3ThRuYJMJ903AhVj+vgDz5Zj2BhZPJ0ytWC8wffpVclu05Au0Lk +Kt3Y/expBKah075TaR4erxzOgoZTXi81/V4Wc1hEkdOKhNyoD2xMjfDwVpavHhHc +ovAb7PWy1cZhDzVzqrXw +=BUuG +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/05314074/attachment.asc b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/05314074/attachment.asc new file mode 100644 index 000000000..61d1d5fc7 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/05314074/attachment.asc @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- +Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) + +iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPkcJgAAoJEOsuQJrxVIpnNA8P/1AY9HcpFZQ0l7bNXzFjABtP +qxeurAL5JfRi1276KEZpYaEHLjlnqnHAfXwGV8XQD1+nSdigqjjtZXTHC97vKkNI +0ESU/lai+OABDrdvGPVAHLuDPOXM+tyMT+M/YLaet67izQEc53XQ17xg4agadslU +RVQfc4/zrJq3UzW1UGEQ1AwdIGmORkgzcBq0M5pZ2n9d3UQEH3TkHjPwW1LucDC2 +KpdUAEUUohqoItPfpVnVfSM4k+5ZEFjFp1bpyMOztf2aopREo3DemYFrQu6olUyP +udJVZDdDKP73cGrgTleOrZelbMaBcX9DSUasc2dD6sF5xjxzbuhhZsLp941orrL4 +Hh6MmUfnqpzBiDi84os9ac+O+79fexC13gcT3coTv6TIVzmjqNj0p5j9kC8Y/yly +dvRRH3Z8GneLMJ54QHhC1/Axu55KRi2Lu1Fae6P84WmIdX0eUxVmiR/2kGRyZcnU +m1h9h08EwKYe9JAqEoCWygPSUjnIOIZzlk7AoRRHx0biLtu9EBonVAIUikGxI9mx +BtwNnBrJWYUOR3ThRuYJMJ903AhVj+vgDz5Zj2BhZPJ0ytWC8wffpVclu05Au0Lk +Kt3Y/expBKah075TaR4erxzOgoZTXi81/V4Wc1hEkdOKhNyoD2xMjfDwVpavHhHc +ovAb7PWy1cZhDzVzqrXw +=BUuG +-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/43969b82/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/43969b82/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7e05291bd --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/43969b82/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +I do notice chromium-browser packages were not updated since january 21. Is it possible to include a more up to date chromium browser release?<div><br></div><div>According to <a href="http://www.chromium.org/developers/calendar">http://www.chromium.org/developers/calendar</a>, the current stable release is 18.0.1025.162 (and current beta version is 19.0.1084.30), mageia beta 3 includes 17.0.963.65 version.</div> +<div><br></div><div>thanks!</div> diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/43969b82/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/43969b82/attachment.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7e05291bd --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/43969b82/attachment.html @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +I do notice chromium-browser packages were not updated since january 21. Is it possible to include a more up to date chromium browser release?<div><br></div><div>According to <a href="http://www.chromium.org/developers/calendar">http://www.chromium.org/developers/calendar</a>, the current stable release is 18.0.1025.162 (and current beta version is 19.0.1084.30), mageia beta 3 includes 17.0.963.65 version.</div> +<div><br></div><div>thanks!</div> diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/4eeecfb3/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/4eeecfb3/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d11183f5f --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/4eeecfb3/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ +<html> + <head> + <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" + http-equiv="Content-Type"> + </head> + <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> + On 20/04/12 19:27, Kristoffer Grundström wrote: + <blockquote cite="mid:4F91AA84.9050408@gmail.com" type="cite"> + <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; + charset=ISO-8859-1"> + Hi!<br> + <br> + Now & then I tend to loose my mind & install Ubuntu on one + of my computers & the last time I did it I heard about PPA's. + I added a PPA & noticed how fun it was to test the code that + it offers.<br> + <br> + This is the explanation of what PPA is & does according to the + Ubuntu-page:<br> + <br> + <b>"Personal Package Archives (PPA) allow you to upload Ubuntu + source packages to be built and published as an apt repository + by Launchpad."</b><br> + <br> + My idea would be something similar.<br> + <br> + It starts with the user that gets annoyed how some Mageia-packages + that are meant to be stable that they aren't.<br> + Instead of having to do the job themselves they can just add a + special media called user-contrib that contains packages built + from git-source to be tested in Cauldron & then released as + Backport-version when confirmed stable enough to see if the issue + they had on the officially stable package is gone.<br> + <br> + I know that it would take many people to build thoose, but I'm + willing to download git-code & compile & build for Mageia.<br> + <br> + I've already managed to compile & build the latest official + version of Transmission without using the official Mageia patches + & I've got NO problem at all using the package.<br> + <br> + Test theese packages & say what you think:<br> + <br> + <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" +href="http://199.91.153.84/c75b5l1s469g/yljxa1e92l5mmix/transmission-debug-2.51%2B-1.x86_64.rpm">http://199.91.153.84/c75b5l1s469g/yljxa1e92l5mmix/transmission-debug-2.51%2B-1.x86_64.rpm</a><br> + <br> + <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" +href="http://199.91.152.243/2wm8pbg3k5eg/9th0m5xxslth99a/transmission-2.51%2B-1.x86_64.rpm">http://199.91.152.243/2wm8pbg3k5eg/9th0m5xxslth99a/transmission-2.51%2B-1.x86_64.rpm</a><br> + <br> + /Kristoffer<br> + </blockquote> + <br> + Hi<br> + <br> + I have thought about it before how it could be useful after Mageia 2 + has been released for there to be PPA's or something like it for + Mageia.<br> + <br> + With Ubuntu PPA's are really just repo's that can be added by users + so that they can get later versions of software that aren't in the + Ubuntu repo's. With PPA's it's meant to be known as well that they + may be buggy, because usually they have just been made by + developers/packagers or something like that I think, and not gone + through a proper Quality Assurance process. Really they are meant to + be aimed at more experienced users, but it seems that more recently + since 2008 or something like that, that quite a lot of less + experienced Ubuntu users may also have at least one PPA installed. + Also to many installed PPA's can cause issues with the Ubuntu + install.<br> + <br> + I have been thinking before about the current Mageia release cycle + and when it comes to Gnome. Since the 9 months release cycle for + example, it seems that sometimes a new major version of Gnome will + have to be skipped, as in not offered by Mageia as an update for any + supported stable final release at the time. I am not a developer, + but I assume those versions of Gnome can be put into Cauldron and + then backported to the current stable release as well, or put into + something like a PPA for users to install into final Mageia + releases. As for Cauldron it should keep on having the latest + versions of Gnome, usually development versions.<br> + <br> + In general most Desktop Linux users want the latest final versions + of the software that they use it seems, and I think that it would be + good if there was a easy way to offer this for most or all packages. + This is where something like Ubuntu's PPA's would come in.<br> + <br> + I think if Mageia has something like PPA's, they shouldn't need to + require QA from the QA team and it should be known users and + potential users that they may be buggy/unstable. Where as backports + of course will have gone through the Mageia QA team process.<br> + <br> + As for the PPA's themselves or the something like it, would need a + website for it like they have for Ubuntu + <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas">https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas</a> and they should only be offered + on the site from people who have gone through the Mageia packaging + process and become trusted packagers I think.<br> + <br> + <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/ubuntu-ppa-technology-explained/">http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/ubuntu-ppa-technology-explained/</a><br> + <br> + <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA">https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA</a><br> + <br> + From Sebastian sebsebseb<br> + <br> + <br> + </body> +</html> diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/4eeecfb3/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/4eeecfb3/attachment.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d11183f5f --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/4eeecfb3/attachment.html @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ +<html> + <head> + <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" + http-equiv="Content-Type"> + </head> + <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> + On 20/04/12 19:27, Kristoffer Grundström wrote: + <blockquote cite="mid:4F91AA84.9050408@gmail.com" type="cite"> + <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; + charset=ISO-8859-1"> + Hi!<br> + <br> + Now & then I tend to loose my mind & install Ubuntu on one + of my computers & the last time I did it I heard about PPA's. + I added a PPA & noticed how fun it was to test the code that + it offers.<br> + <br> + This is the explanation of what PPA is & does according to the + Ubuntu-page:<br> + <br> + <b>"Personal Package Archives (PPA) allow you to upload Ubuntu + source packages to be built and published as an apt repository + by Launchpad."</b><br> + <br> + My idea would be something similar.<br> + <br> + It starts with the user that gets annoyed how some Mageia-packages + that are meant to be stable that they aren't.<br> + Instead of having to do the job themselves they can just add a + special media called user-contrib that contains packages built + from git-source to be tested in Cauldron & then released as + Backport-version when confirmed stable enough to see if the issue + they had on the officially stable package is gone.<br> + <br> + I know that it would take many people to build thoose, but I'm + willing to download git-code & compile & build for Mageia.<br> + <br> + I've already managed to compile & build the latest official + version of Transmission without using the official Mageia patches + & I've got NO problem at all using the package.<br> + <br> + Test theese packages & say what you think:<br> + <br> + <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" +href="http://199.91.153.84/c75b5l1s469g/yljxa1e92l5mmix/transmission-debug-2.51%2B-1.x86_64.rpm">http://199.91.153.84/c75b5l1s469g/yljxa1e92l5mmix/transmission-debug-2.51%2B-1.x86_64.rpm</a><br> + <br> + <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" +href="http://199.91.152.243/2wm8pbg3k5eg/9th0m5xxslth99a/transmission-2.51%2B-1.x86_64.rpm">http://199.91.152.243/2wm8pbg3k5eg/9th0m5xxslth99a/transmission-2.51%2B-1.x86_64.rpm</a><br> + <br> + /Kristoffer<br> + </blockquote> + <br> + Hi<br> + <br> + I have thought about it before how it could be useful after Mageia 2 + has been released for there to be PPA's or something like it for + Mageia.<br> + <br> + With Ubuntu PPA's are really just repo's that can be added by users + so that they can get later versions of software that aren't in the + Ubuntu repo's. With PPA's it's meant to be known as well that they + may be buggy, because usually they have just been made by + developers/packagers or something like that I think, and not gone + through a proper Quality Assurance process. Really they are meant to + be aimed at more experienced users, but it seems that more recently + since 2008 or something like that, that quite a lot of less + experienced Ubuntu users may also have at least one PPA installed. + Also to many installed PPA's can cause issues with the Ubuntu + install.<br> + <br> + I have been thinking before about the current Mageia release cycle + and when it comes to Gnome. Since the 9 months release cycle for + example, it seems that sometimes a new major version of Gnome will + have to be skipped, as in not offered by Mageia as an update for any + supported stable final release at the time. I am not a developer, + but I assume those versions of Gnome can be put into Cauldron and + then backported to the current stable release as well, or put into + something like a PPA for users to install into final Mageia + releases. As for Cauldron it should keep on having the latest + versions of Gnome, usually development versions.<br> + <br> + In general most Desktop Linux users want the latest final versions + of the software that they use it seems, and I think that it would be + good if there was a easy way to offer this for most or all packages. + This is where something like Ubuntu's PPA's would come in.<br> + <br> + I think if Mageia has something like PPA's, they shouldn't need to + require QA from the QA team and it should be known users and + potential users that they may be buggy/unstable. Where as backports + of course will have gone through the Mageia QA team process.<br> + <br> + As for the PPA's themselves or the something like it, would need a + website for it like they have for Ubuntu + <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas">https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas</a> and they should only be offered + on the site from people who have gone through the Mageia packaging + process and become trusted packagers I think.<br> + <br> + <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/ubuntu-ppa-technology-explained/">http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/ubuntu-ppa-technology-explained/</a><br> + <br> + <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA">https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA</a><br> + <br> + From Sebastian sebsebseb<br> + <br> + <br> + </body> +</html> diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/a1eeeb75/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/a1eeeb75/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4aa10be49 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/a1eeeb75/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Sebastian sebsebseb <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sebsebseb_mageia@gmx.com">sebsebseb_mageia@gmx.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> + + + + + <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><div><div class="h5">As for the PPA's themselves or the something like it, would need a + website for it like they have for Ubuntu + <a href="https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas" target="_blank">https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas</a> and they should only be offered + on the site from people who have gone through the Mageia packaging + process and become trusted packagers I think.</div></div><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>My understanding was that part of the attraction of Ubuntu's PPAs was that any registered user could create one, making it an easy way for developers to distribute their software until Ubuntu proper gets around to creating an official package.</div> +<div><br></div></div><br clear="all">William Tracy<br><a href="mailto:afishionado@gmail.com" target="_blank">afishionado@gmail.com</a><br>(408) 685-4819<br><br> diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/a1eeeb75/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/a1eeeb75/attachment.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4aa10be49 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120420/a1eeeb75/attachment.html @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Sebastian sebsebseb <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sebsebseb_mageia@gmx.com">sebsebseb_mageia@gmx.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> + + + + + <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><div><div class="h5">As for the PPA's themselves or the something like it, would need a + website for it like they have for Ubuntu + <a href="https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas" target="_blank">https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas</a> and they should only be offered + on the site from people who have gone through the Mageia packaging + process and become trusted packagers I think.</div></div><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>My understanding was that part of the attraction of Ubuntu's PPAs was that any registered user could create one, making it an easy way for developers to distribute their software until Ubuntu proper gets around to creating an official package.</div> +<div><br></div></div><br clear="all">William Tracy<br><a href="mailto:afishionado@gmail.com" target="_blank">afishionado@gmail.com</a><br>(408) 685-4819<br><br> |