diff options
| author | Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org> | 2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org> | 2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000 |
| commit | 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch) | |
| tree | b175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101011 | |
| parent | fa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff) | |
| download | archives-master.tar archives-master.tar.gz archives-master.tar.bz2 archives-master.tar.xz archives-master.zip | |
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101011')
4 files changed, 80 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101011/c0f4beb7/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101011/c0f4beb7/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8a8867280 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101011/c0f4beb7/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/10/6 vfmBOFH <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:vfmbofh@gmail.com">vfmbofh@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> +<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/10/1 atilla ontas <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tarakbumba@gmail.com" target="_blank">tarakbumba@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> + +I'm just wondering if we follow Mandriva's release cycle model. Every<br> +6th months a release or one year and one release. I think we should<br> +make one release in one year. By doing so devs and translators won't<br> +be in rush in every 6 months. Also there are major changes like<br> +systemd/upstart; those system related things will be more mature in a<br> +year to use. It makes the distro more stable and decraese mirrors<br> +space waste.<br> +<br> +One more thing. Do we follow Mandriva's release naming scheme? I.e. do<br> +we call our first release 2011.x ? I don't like this naming scheme and<br> +suggesting using number of release as naming like Mageia 1.0 or using<br> +code names.<br> +<br> +What's your opinion?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Hi all.</div><div><br></div><div>At this time, there is a survey asking to the blogdrake's community what kind of release cycle they prefer. This survey will be active until the weekend and I think this could be an acceptable look about community preferences.</div> + +<div><br></div><div>We must keep on mind we're creating a user-oriented distro, so we must be stay in touch about their preferences.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers</div></div><br> +</blockquote></div><br>Hi all again.<br><br>As i said, there's the results of the poll published in Blogdrake:<br><br>58% of votes are for maintain the same mandriva's release cycle scheme (same scheme, not parallel releases) There are several opinions about the periodicity of the releases: six months, eight months, annual... all options are more or less the same level of preference.<br> +<br>24% has chosen the "Rolling-light" model. as in the traditional model, there are opinions that support the annual release, six months or eight months. But this option, is dominated by the annual release of the "core".<br> +<br>15% supports the "pure-Rolling" model. There's nothing to say about release dates.<br><br>Surprisingly, there is also a minority support to a model similar to the "Debian way". I must confess that this last option on the poll was started as a joke, because Blogdrake's members often suffer "versionitis". But there are the votes (3%)...<br> +<br>So, these are the results of the survey. Apparently, the Blogdrake's community is closer to a model "release + backports".<br><br>I think it should be noted (as far as possible) the preferences of the community, in addition to technical and logistical constraints. Maybe with similar polls in other local communities?<br> +<br>Cheers.<br> diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101011/c0f4beb7/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101011/c0f4beb7/attachment.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8a8867280 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101011/c0f4beb7/attachment.html @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/10/6 vfmBOFH <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:vfmbofh@gmail.com">vfmbofh@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> +<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/10/1 atilla ontas <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tarakbumba@gmail.com" target="_blank">tarakbumba@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> + +I'm just wondering if we follow Mandriva's release cycle model. Every<br> +6th months a release or one year and one release. I think we should<br> +make one release in one year. By doing so devs and translators won't<br> +be in rush in every 6 months. Also there are major changes like<br> +systemd/upstart; those system related things will be more mature in a<br> +year to use. It makes the distro more stable and decraese mirrors<br> +space waste.<br> +<br> +One more thing. Do we follow Mandriva's release naming scheme? I.e. do<br> +we call our first release 2011.x ? I don't like this naming scheme and<br> +suggesting using number of release as naming like Mageia 1.0 or using<br> +code names.<br> +<br> +What's your opinion?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Hi all.</div><div><br></div><div>At this time, there is a survey asking to the blogdrake's community what kind of release cycle they prefer. This survey will be active until the weekend and I think this could be an acceptable look about community preferences.</div> + +<div><br></div><div>We must keep on mind we're creating a user-oriented distro, so we must be stay in touch about their preferences.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers</div></div><br> +</blockquote></div><br>Hi all again.<br><br>As i said, there's the results of the poll published in Blogdrake:<br><br>58% of votes are for maintain the same mandriva's release cycle scheme (same scheme, not parallel releases) There are several opinions about the periodicity of the releases: six months, eight months, annual... all options are more or less the same level of preference.<br> +<br>24% has chosen the "Rolling-light" model. as in the traditional model, there are opinions that support the annual release, six months or eight months. But this option, is dominated by the annual release of the "core".<br> +<br>15% supports the "pure-Rolling" model. There's nothing to say about release dates.<br><br>Surprisingly, there is also a minority support to a model similar to the "Debian way". I must confess that this last option on the poll was started as a joke, because Blogdrake's members often suffer "versionitis". But there are the votes (3%)...<br> +<br>So, these are the results of the survey. Apparently, the Blogdrake's community is closer to a model "release + backports".<br><br>I think it should be noted (as far as possible) the preferences of the community, in addition to technical and logistical constraints. Maybe with similar polls in other local communities?<br> +<br>Cheers.<br> diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101011/dc0ae6df/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101011/dc0ae6df/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..bfce4d219 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101011/dc0ae6df/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/10/11 Wolfgang Bornath <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:molch.b@googlemail.com">molch.b@googlemail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> +2010/10/11 vfmBOFH <<a href="mailto:vfmbofh@gmail.com">vfmbofh@gmail.com</a>>:<br> +<div class="im">><br> +> I think it should be noted (as far as possible) the preferences of the<br> +> community, in addition to technical and logistical constraints. Maybe with<br> +> similar polls in other local communities?<br> +<br> +</div>Will do in MandrivaUser.de because I also think it is important to ask<br> +the community.<br> +But I'm also aware that the result will not be near the real opinion<br> +of the community. The percentage of active members of the community is<br> +quite small, so the result of a poll will be only that of a small<br> +percentage of the community. I think the technical and logistic<br> +reasons and benefits/constraints may be much stronger advocates of one<br> +or the other release system.<br> +</blockquote></div><br>I agree.<br><br>But, despite it's a small precentage, it's a percentage of the "actual" and "active" members of the community.<br><br>BTW, some of blogdrake's voters is a former user / admin who was MIA for three years or so. Don't underestimate the interest generated by mageia's project :)<br> diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101011/dc0ae6df/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101011/dc0ae6df/attachment.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..bfce4d219 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101011/dc0ae6df/attachment.html @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/10/11 Wolfgang Bornath <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:molch.b@googlemail.com">molch.b@googlemail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> +2010/10/11 vfmBOFH <<a href="mailto:vfmbofh@gmail.com">vfmbofh@gmail.com</a>>:<br> +<div class="im">><br> +> I think it should be noted (as far as possible) the preferences of the<br> +> community, in addition to technical and logistical constraints. Maybe with<br> +> similar polls in other local communities?<br> +<br> +</div>Will do in MandrivaUser.de because I also think it is important to ask<br> +the community.<br> +But I'm also aware that the result will not be near the real opinion<br> +of the community. The percentage of active members of the community is<br> +quite small, so the result of a poll will be only that of a small<br> +percentage of the community. I think the technical and logistic<br> +reasons and benefits/constraints may be much stronger advocates of one<br> +or the other release system.<br> +</blockquote></div><br>I agree.<br><br>But, despite it's a small precentage, it's a percentage of the "actual" and "active" members of the community.<br><br>BTW, some of blogdrake's voters is a former user / admin who was MIA for three years or so. Don't underestimate the interest generated by mageia's project :)<br> |