summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101007/138c9beb
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
committerNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
commit1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch)
treeb175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101007/138c9beb
parentfa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff)
downloadarchives-master.tar
archives-master.tar.gz
archives-master.tar.bz2
archives-master.tar.xz
archives-master.zip
Add zarb MLs html archivesHEADmaster
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101007/138c9beb')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101007/138c9beb/attachment-0001.html24
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101007/138c9beb/attachment.html24
2 files changed, 48 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101007/138c9beb/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101007/138c9beb/attachment-0001.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..325123a62
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101007/138c9beb/attachment-0001.html
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/10/6 Olivier Thauvin <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:nanardon@nanardon.zarb.org">nanardon@nanardon.zarb.org</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
+<div class="im">* Buchan Milne (<a href="mailto:bgmilne@multilinks.com">bgmilne@multilinks.com</a>) wrote:<br>
+</div><div class="im">&gt; On Tuesday, 5 October 2010 23:39:09 Tux99 wrote:<br>
+&gt; &gt; On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, nicolas vigier wrote:<br>
+&gt;<br>
+</div><div class="im">&gt; &gt; 3) I mentioned earlier that the packager would need to use good<br>
+&gt; &gt; judgement and not include major incompatible version changes<br>
+&gt;<br>
+&gt; You are aware that this is significantly more work than &#39;mdvsys submit -t<br>
+&gt; 2010.1 --define section=main/backports $package&#39; (after some minimal testing of<br>
+&gt; course)?<br>
+<br>
+</div>This part of the discuss let me think something.<br>
+<br>
+We have both some people wanting huge set of backport and other wanting<br>
+long life release w/o change except security/bug fix.<br>
+<br>
+So, why not alternate both, 1 release with backports denied but long<br>
+life, and the 2nd with backports and update but during a shorter period.<br>
+(X.0 would be the new distro with backports, X.1 the one more servers<br>
+oriented or enterprise).<br>
+<br>
+What do you think ?<br>
+<font color="#888888"></font><br></blockquote><div><font color="#888888"><br>i am not pro this, i think this is better to have the same policy for all the releases.</font> </div></div>
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101007/138c9beb/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101007/138c9beb/attachment.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..325123a62
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101007/138c9beb/attachment.html
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/10/6 Olivier Thauvin <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:nanardon@nanardon.zarb.org">nanardon@nanardon.zarb.org</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
+<div class="im">* Buchan Milne (<a href="mailto:bgmilne@multilinks.com">bgmilne@multilinks.com</a>) wrote:<br>
+</div><div class="im">&gt; On Tuesday, 5 October 2010 23:39:09 Tux99 wrote:<br>
+&gt; &gt; On Wed, 6 Oct 2010, nicolas vigier wrote:<br>
+&gt;<br>
+</div><div class="im">&gt; &gt; 3) I mentioned earlier that the packager would need to use good<br>
+&gt; &gt; judgement and not include major incompatible version changes<br>
+&gt;<br>
+&gt; You are aware that this is significantly more work than &#39;mdvsys submit -t<br>
+&gt; 2010.1 --define section=main/backports $package&#39; (after some minimal testing of<br>
+&gt; course)?<br>
+<br>
+</div>This part of the discuss let me think something.<br>
+<br>
+We have both some people wanting huge set of backport and other wanting<br>
+long life release w/o change except security/bug fix.<br>
+<br>
+So, why not alternate both, 1 release with backports denied but long<br>
+life, and the 2nd with backports and update but during a shorter period.<br>
+(X.0 would be the new distro with backports, X.1 the one more servers<br>
+oriented or enterprise).<br>
+<br>
+What do you think ?<br>
+<font color="#888888"></font><br></blockquote><div><font color="#888888"><br>i am not pro this, i think this is better to have the same policy for all the releases.</font> </div></div>