Add zarb MLs html archivesHEADmaster

2 files changed, 32 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101006/85532959/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101006/85532959/attachment-0001.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a9b557ffc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101006/85532959/attachment-0001.html
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/10/1 atilla ontas <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:tarakbumba@gmail.com">tarakbumba@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
+I&#39;m just wondering if we follow Mandriva&#39;s release cycle model. Every<br>
+6th months a release or one year and one release. I think we should<br>
+make one release in one year. By doing so devs and translators won&#39;t<br>
+be in rush in every 6 months. Also there are major changes like<br>
+systemd/upstart; those system related things will be more mature in a<br>
+year to use. It makes the distro more stable and decraese mirrors<br>
+space waste.<br>
+<br>
+One more thing. Do we follow Mandriva&#39;s release naming scheme? I.e. do<br>
+we call our first release 2011.x ? I don&#39;t like this naming scheme and<br>
+suggesting using number of release as naming like Mageia 1.0 or using<br>
+code names.<br>
+<br>
+What&#39;s your opinion?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Hi all.</div><div><br></div><div>At this time, there is a survey asking to the blogdrake&#39;s community  what kind of release cycle they prefer. This survey will be active until the weekend and I think this could be an acceptable look about community preferences.</div>
+<div><br></div><div>We must keep on mind we&#39;re creating a user-oriented distro, so we must be stay in touch about their preferences.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers</div></div><br>
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101006/85532959/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101006/85532959/attachment.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a9b557ffc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20101006/85532959/attachment.html
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/10/1 atilla ontas <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:tarakbumba@gmail.com">tarakbumba@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
+I&#39;m just wondering if we follow Mandriva&#39;s release cycle model. Every<br>
+6th months a release or one year and one release. I think we should<br>
+make one release in one year. By doing so devs and translators won&#39;t<br>
+be in rush in every 6 months. Also there are major changes like<br>
+systemd/upstart; those system related things will be more mature in a<br>
+year to use. It makes the distro more stable and decraese mirrors<br>
+space waste.<br>
+<br>
+One more thing. Do we follow Mandriva&#39;s release naming scheme? I.e. do<br>
+we call our first release 2011.x ? I don&#39;t like this naming scheme and<br>
+suggesting using number of release as naming like Mageia 1.0 or using<br>
+code names.<br>
+<br>
+What&#39;s your opinion?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Hi all.</div><div><br></div><div>At this time, there is a survey asking to the blogdrake&#39;s community  what kind of release cycle they prefer. This survey will be active until the weekend and I think this could be an acceptable look about community preferences.</div>
+<div><br></div><div>We must keep on mind we&#39;re creating a user-oriented distro, so we must be stay in touch about their preferences.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers</div></div><br>