summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016752.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
committerNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
commit1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch)
treeb175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016752.html
parentfa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff)
downloadarchives-master.tar
archives-master.tar.gz
archives-master.tar.bz2
archives-master.tar.xz
archives-master.zip
Add zarb MLs html archivesHEADmaster
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016752.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016752.html131
1 files changed, 131 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016752.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016752.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8a6e90fdb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-June/016752.html
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20bug%202317%20revisited%3A%20--update%20option%20should%20behave%0A%09like%20--search-media&In-Reply-To=%3C1432070.Slx7WnIyHW%40localhost%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="016749.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="016738.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media</H1>
+ <B>AL13N</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20bug%202317%20revisited%3A%20--update%20option%20should%20behave%0A%09like%20--search-media&In-Reply-To=%3C1432070.Slx7WnIyHW%40localhost%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media">alien at rmail.be
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Fri Jun 22 17:57:12 CEST 2012</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016749.html">[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="016738.html">[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#16752">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#16752">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#16752">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#16752">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Op vrijdag 22 juni 2012 15:00:14 schreef Sander Lepik:
+&gt;<i> 22.06.2012 13:20, AL13N kirjutas:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; And about the conflicting part - well, at that point you are already on
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; your own, at least
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; as i see it. Backports can break updating/upgrading, we can't avoid that
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; (and for the same
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; reason backports should be cherry-picked, so you get as little trouble as
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; possible). The
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; best you can do at that point is to submit a bug about broken update and
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; maybe (just maybe)
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; we can submit the updated package that needs those new deps into
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; backports
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; too - so you can
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; pull it from there and get over the update problem. But this should be a
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; rare case anyway.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Breaking updates because we try to support backports is not something that
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; i wish to have, no matter how rare the case.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Sorry to disappoint you, but this is something you can't avoid. And for that
+</I>&gt;<i> reason backports are not enabled by default ;)
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; And your solution wouldn't work, except for backporting the update and
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; having the user manually try to use the backported version for that too...
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Yes, you are finally starting to get my point. User has to manually fix
+</I>&gt;<i> those problems with backports and there is nothing we can do about it (at
+</I>&gt;<i> least it won't be easy).
+</I>
+considering both these points, we can't call backports supported IMHO.
+
+i'd rather have unsupported backports then, as we had before in mdv. calling
+it supported and not being able to fix these 2 points is just ridiculous.
+
+I've tried to find a solution where backports are feasable, but it seems noone
+wishes to use it or consider it like that (where you're using all backports),
+so let's just cut the case and have unsupported backports. it's less work on
+QA.
+
+
+
+but this is all regarding backports, and not for bug 2317.
+
+considering that backports is unsupported, my patch for 2317 is still valid,
+because you shouldn't have backports selected when updating, because it's not
+supported.
+
+I still think my patch is better, but if someone can make the patch using the
+corresponding release media, i'll not object anymore...
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="016749.html">[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="016738.html">[Mageia-dev] bug 2317 revisited: --update option should behave like --search-media
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#16752">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#16752">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#16752">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#16752">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>