1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-webteam] Server requirements second attempt
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-webteam%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-webteam%5D%20Server%20requirements%20second%20attempt&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTi%3DRh_anM8QAiMrEQJhGiK9OZ6zi5cBfu_vz1HDf%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000227.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="000222.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-webteam] Server requirements second attempt</H1>
<B>Kosmas Chatzimichalis</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-webteam%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-webteam%5D%20Server%20requirements%20second%20attempt&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTi%3DRh_anM8QAiMrEQJhGiK9OZ6zi5cBfu_vz1HDf%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-webteam] Server requirements second attempt">Kosmas at mach7x.com
</A><BR>
<I>Tue Feb 15 21:23:51 CET 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000227.html">[Mageia-webteam] Server requirements second attempt
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000222.html">[Mageia-webteam] test
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#271">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#271">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#271">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#271">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On 13 February 2011 19:55, Michael Scherer <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-webteam">misc at zarb.org</A>> wrote:
><i> On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:56:45 +0000, Kosmas Chatzimichalis wrote:
</I>><i>
</I>>><i> Michael,
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> Here's the second attempt about requirement for the server following the
</I>>><i> initial one some time ago.
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> Not sure if we should be looking at the Mandriva Cooker rpms or other
</I>>><i> specific version.
</I>>><i> The ones below are from the Cooker distribution, but if I should be
</I>>><i> looking
</I>>><i> at a different one let me know:
</I>>><i>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Well, for ruby, the issue is that we are using puppet on server, and so
</I>><i> updating to cooker
</I>><i> rpms is IMHO risky. I would prefer to keep it with supported and tested
</I>><i> version ( as puppet
</I>><i> is using rails for active record, for reporting and this is used for
</I>><i> deploying postgresql db ).
</I>><i> So I can try, but this will requires more testing ( as I need to check that
</I>><i> everything still work
</I>><i> fine on puppet side ).
</I>><i>
</I>
Sure, no problem Michael.
Maybe we didn't do it right from the beginning, as we should have specified
which versions to use in the first place.
><i>
</I>><i>
</I>>><i> - ruby-1.8.7.p330-1mdv2011.0.i586.rpm (main)
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> - ruby-RubyGems-1.3.7-1mdv2011.0.noarch.rpm (main)
</I>>><i> - rails-2.3.10-1mdv2011.0.noarch.rpm (contrib) - altough there is a
</I>>><i> security upgrade to 2.3.11 (
</I>>><i> <A HREF="http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2011/2/8/new-releases-2-3-11-and-3-0-4">http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2011/2/8/new-releases-2-3-11-and-3-0-4</A>)
</I>>><i> - Database to be used either MySQL or PostgreSQL
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> I believe that there are benefits for using version 3, so I would like to
</I>>><i> investigate if it's possible to build a package for it.
</I>>><i>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Well, how hard is this to update later the project to rails 3 ?
</I>><i> I mean, the first version is quite simple, so what about doing the first in
</I>><i> rails 2.X
</I>><i> with fewer features, and later do it in rails 3 with more features ( and
</I>><i> likely better architectures, as we
</I>><i> often gain insight of the application once we dvelop the first version and
</I>><i> get the first feedback )
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Maybe this was badly specified, or I badly explained, but a simple CRUd
</I>><i> will be enough, do not really
</I>><i> add too much feature for the first version.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> As mentioned before, maybe we should have specified the available versions
</I>in the beginning.
No problem, can do it again.
Let me know which version I should be using.
><i>
</I>><i> If you know who is current maintainer for it, I can get in touch and see
</I>>><i> if
</I>>><i> I can help with that.
</I>>><i>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Shikamaru, ( <A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-webteam">shikamaru at mandriva</A> )
</I>><i>
</I>
Thanks. Got contact :-)
Kosmas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/mageia-webteam/attachments/20110215/355f6b5d/attachment.html>
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000227.html">[Mageia-webteam] Server requirements second attempt
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000222.html">[Mageia-webteam] test
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#271">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#271">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#271">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#271">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-webteam">More information about the Mageia-webteam
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
